1998
DOI: 10.1006/jevp.1998.0080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group Differences in the Aesthetic Evaluation of Nature Development Plans: A Multilevel Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
119
5
6

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
9
119
5
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Livestock farmers preferred open landscapes whereas the other users liked landscapes with denser vegetation. Similar findings on the differences in attitudes to rural landscapes on the part of producers has been noted by ven den Berg et al (1998).…”
Section: Preferences For Landscapesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Livestock farmers preferred open landscapes whereas the other users liked landscapes with denser vegetation. Similar findings on the differences in attitudes to rural landscapes on the part of producers has been noted by ven den Berg et al (1998).…”
Section: Preferences For Landscapesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In contrast, forests were perceived as better suppliers of regulating and cultural services such as hunting, tourism, tranquility, and aesthetic value, while simultaneously producing wood and timber. The high perception of the aesthetic value of forests could be interpreted as an expression of phytophilia (Ulrich 1986, Ulrich 1990, López-Santiago 1994, which is the phenomenon of people generally preferring green, lush, forested vistas over arid landscapes (DeLucio and Múgica 1994).…”
Section: Forests Versus Cropland Landscapes As Providers Of Ecosystemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most commonly, respondents are asked to evaluate representative photos (e.g., projected slides or prints) or photomontages depicting landscapes. Such evaluations describe the qualities associated with scenic views [40][41][42][43], appreciated landscape management [44], and location of special places [45]. Photo-editing software has added new dimensionality to these landscape evaluations by enabling realistic manipulation of existing images through adding and subtracting different landscape elements (e.g., Fig.…”
Section: Photo-based Visualizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also efforts to investigate fundamental landscape values that can be represented as spatial indices. Qualities of tranquility, complexity, mystery, coherence, openness, smoothness, ease of motion, and heterogeneity that can be represented directly or indirectly through spatial data and metrics have been extensively investigated for their importance to people [41][42][43].…”
Section: Photo-based Visualizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%