2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpaa.2012.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group graded algebras and multiplicities bounded by a constant

Abstract: a b s t r a c tLet G be a finite group and A a G-graded algebra over a field of characteristic zero. When A is a PI-algebra, the graded codimensions of A are exponentially bounded and one can study the corresponding graded cocharacters via the representation theory of products of symmetric groups. Here we characterize in two different ways when the corresponding multiplicities are bounded by a constant.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. , n s )-cocharacter of the algebras UT g 2 , E, E a were computed (see [4,13,28,29]) and it turned out that the corresponding sequences of colengths are not bounded by any constant.…”
Section: Polynomial Codimension Growth and Colengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…. , n s )-cocharacter of the algebras UT g 2 , E, E a were computed (see [4,13,28,29]) and it turned out that the corresponding sequences of colengths are not bounded by any constant.…”
Section: Polynomial Codimension Growth and Colengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, assume that l G n (A) ≤ k is bounded by a constant k. In this case UT g 2 , E, E a , F C h p / ∈ var G (A) for all g ∈ G, a ∈ G of order 2, and h ∈ G of order a prime p (see [4,13,28,29] and Theorem 4.1). By Theorem 1.3 this implies that var G (A) is of polynomial growth.…”
Section: Polynomial Codimension Growth and Colengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar result was obtained by Otera in [23] for finitely generated superalgebras: in this case the variety of superalgebras V does not contain the superalgebra U T 2 (trivial grading) and U T sup 2 , i.e., the algebra U T 2 with the canonical non-trivial Z 2 -grading. The latter characterization was extended in [3] for G-graded algebras, where G is any finite abelian group, by excluding from the variety of G-graded algebras V the algebra U T 2 with any G-grading. Finally, in [28], Vieira studied the same problem in the setting of finitely generated algebras with involution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%