1985
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-1985-0805958-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group-graded rings and duality

Abstract: We give an alternative construction of the duality between finite group actions and group gradings on rings which was shown by Cohen and Montgomery in [1]. This duality is then used to extend known results on skew group rings to corresponding results for large classes of group-graded rings. Finally we modify the construction slightly to handle infinite groups.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter gives a generalization of a categorical version of [6, Theorem 2.6] of Beattie. We note that the definition of smash products given in [9] is easy to handle and very useful, and that we can regard it as a categorical version of the definition of smash products by Quinn [22] (when the group is finite), and it enables us to formulate the covering construction by Green [15], and recovers the usual smash product of a k-algebra and the k-dual of a group algebra. In this paper we formulated the categorical version of Cohen-Montgomery duality as much as possible in the scope of categories.…”
Section: Orbit Categories and Covering Functorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter gives a generalization of a categorical version of [6, Theorem 2.6] of Beattie. We note that the definition of smash products given in [9] is easy to handle and very useful, and that we can regard it as a categorical version of the definition of smash products by Quinn [22] (when the group is finite), and it enables us to formulate the covering construction by Green [15], and recovers the usual smash product of a k-algebra and the k-dual of a group algebra. In this paper we formulated the categorical version of Cohen-Montgomery duality as much as possible in the scope of categories.…”
Section: Orbit Categories and Covering Functorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again by Proposition 1.1, Q e = Qe is a left Noetherian ring. Hence, by Quinn's results[16], Q is left Noetherian; and thus left Goldie. EXAMPLE.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…These turn out to be very difiBcult questions as they are even unsolved for group rings. However some results on Noetherianess are known if the ring is graded by a (polycyclic-by-) finite group (see [4], [16]). Therefore we are able to solve both questions (Section 1) for rings weakly or strongly graded by a cancellative monoid which is contained in a polycyclic-by-finite (unique product) group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thus identify A with its image A. Proof (i) This was proved in [15] and [12], using the fact that End( A C) is isomorphic to the ring of finite rows |G| × |G|-matrices over A. Here, we can restrict ourselves to the colinear endomorphism ring End( C C).…”
Section: Application To Group-graded Modulesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This pairing is constructed using the smash product [6,15] and the canonical coring arising from a group-graded base ring. Using this functor, we will apply the results of Sect.…”
Section: Application To Group-graded Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%