2021 Proceedings of the Workshop on Algorithm Engineering and Experiments (ALENEX) 2021
DOI: 10.1137/1.9781611976472.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group-Harmonic and Group-Closeness Maximization – Approximation and Engineering

Abstract: Centrality measures characterize important nodes in networks. Efficiently computing such nodes has received a lot of attention. When considering the generalization of computing central groups of nodes, challenging *

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For monotonic submodular problems, the generic greedy algorithm has an approximation ratio of 1 − 1∕e . Even for non-submodular problems such as k-GRIP (see Summers et al (2017) for a counterexample), the greedy algorithm still often leads to solutions of high quality (Summers and Kamgarpour 2019; Angriman et al 2021). Stochastic greedy algorithms that improve the time complexity of the standard greedy approach (in a general setting) were proposed in Mirzasoleiman et al (2015); and Hassidim and Singer (2017).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For monotonic submodular problems, the generic greedy algorithm has an approximation ratio of 1 − 1∕e . Even for non-submodular problems such as k-GRIP (see Summers et al (2017) for a counterexample), the greedy algorithm still often leads to solutions of high quality (Summers and Kamgarpour 2019; Angriman et al 2021). Stochastic greedy algorithms that improve the time complexity of the standard greedy approach (in a general setting) were proposed in Mirzasoleiman et al (2015); and Hassidim and Singer (2017).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%