“…Inorganic photosensitizers, for example TiO 2 , resist oxidation, , but TiO 2 exhibits a wide band gap requiring UV light for the creation of reactive electron–hole pairs, while also exhibiting an unfavorable fast recombination rate of the charge carriers. , Sustained efforts have been made to narrow the TiO 2 band gap via doping, , but the absorption of energy has not been shifted significantly toward the visible–NIR region of the solar spectrum, where most of the energy of solar radiation is concentrated . Organic photosensitizers such as Rose Bengal produce another oxidant, singlet molecular delta oxygen, 1 Δ g 1 O 2 , from its triplet ground state, 3 Σ g 3 O 2 , but are susceptible to attack and degradation by the reactive oxygen species they produce. , A class of bio-inspired organic photosensitizers that survive electrophilic, nucleophilic, and radical attacks has been reported, their refractory properties being imparted by the presence of C–F bonds. , The prototypical molecule is zinc 1,4,8,11,15,18,22,25-octakisfluoro-2,3,9,10,16,17,23,24-octakisperfluoro(isopropyl)phthalocyanine, abbreviated F 64 PcZn, shown in Figure . Importantly, this class of molecules has frontier orbital energy gaps that remain relatively constant with modifications of the fluorinated substituents, thus allowing structural variations without significant shifts in their Q-band light absorption, which occurs in the 600–800 nm visible–NIR region. − The enhanced chemical robustness is due to the aliphatic perfluoroalkyl groups, not present in either the all-aromatic F 16 Pc scaffold, susceptible to electron loss and nucleophilic attack, or the parent H 16 Pc molecule that contains weaker C–H bonds.…”