2013
DOI: 10.1177/1088868313497999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group Marginalization

Abstract: An extensive research literature has examined the reactions of individuals facing interpersonal rejection. Small groups can also be rejected, but current research tells us little about the experiences of groups and their members directly. We integrate findings from various literatures to gain insight into shared rejection experiences and their outcomes. Of most practical importance, we argue that groups can be expected to react with more hostility than individuals when rejected. Four existing models that accou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Social inequality results in intentional rejection with demotion to a powerless position in society: which severely restricts survivability (Albrecht, Devlieger, & Van Hove, 2009; Betts & Hinsz, 2013; Gerlach, 2015; Lynam & Cowley, 2007; Priebe et al, 2012; Stevens, Hall, & Meleis, 1992). This act of rejection is perpetuated through ideologies such as racism, classism, colonialism, and constrictive gender role norms perpetuated through mechanisms such as implicit bias, bullying, stigmatization (Van Den Tillaart, Kurtz, & Cash, 2009), scapegoating, residential segregation, mass incarceration, inequity in pay rates, disparities in unemployment rates, and lack of access to affordable healthcare services (Betts & Hinsz, 2013; Eliassen, Melhus, Hansen, & Broderstad, 2013). Thus, resulting in the restriction of participation in the use of social and health care services (Lous, Friis, Vinding, & Fonager, 2012; Priebe et al, 2012; Sanders & Munford, 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social inequality results in intentional rejection with demotion to a powerless position in society: which severely restricts survivability (Albrecht, Devlieger, & Van Hove, 2009; Betts & Hinsz, 2013; Gerlach, 2015; Lynam & Cowley, 2007; Priebe et al, 2012; Stevens, Hall, & Meleis, 1992). This act of rejection is perpetuated through ideologies such as racism, classism, colonialism, and constrictive gender role norms perpetuated through mechanisms such as implicit bias, bullying, stigmatization (Van Den Tillaart, Kurtz, & Cash, 2009), scapegoating, residential segregation, mass incarceration, inequity in pay rates, disparities in unemployment rates, and lack of access to affordable healthcare services (Betts & Hinsz, 2013; Eliassen, Melhus, Hansen, & Broderstad, 2013). Thus, resulting in the restriction of participation in the use of social and health care services (Lous, Friis, Vinding, & Fonager, 2012; Priebe et al, 2012; Sanders & Munford, 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment approaches have to bear in mind this identity pathology that has to be addressed in order to arrive at a long-lasting change of the disorder. The new psychotherapeutic approach Adolescent Identity Treatment (AIT); [15,39] has been developed to place identity pathology in the focus of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Groups also often provide individuals with a sense of safety and invulnerability (Janis, 1982; Park & Hinsz, 2006), and if a “safety in numbers” belief is prevalent (Park & Hinsz, 2006), then belonging to a group should be related to feelings of security and reductions in distress. And since groups provide opportunities to satisfy various psychological needs (e.g., belongingness; Baumeister & Leary, 1995; Betts & Hinsz, 2013), reductions in negative mood are expected through need fulfillment.…”
Section: Positive and Negative Affect In Group Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%