1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1727(199924)15:4<379::aid-sdr179>3.0.co;2-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group model-building: tackling messy problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
387
0
16

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 507 publications
(407 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(57 reference statements)
4
387
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Stakeholders often possess a diversity of beliefs about the level of (un)desirability of various behaviors, acceptability of intervention, or even how best to intervene when prevention is agreed upon. Such disagreement plagues prevention science with what Vennix refers to as Bmessy problems^-Bless tangible, ill-defined strategic issues…that is, situations in which there are large differences of opinion on the problem or even on the question of whether there is a problem^ [68] (p.380). Several additional types of uncertainty that are important include: uncertainties in the data and evidence (e.g., natural variability, measurement, and sampling errors), uncertainty in the nature of causal relationships (e.g., causal mechanisms, association versus causality, strength of intervention effects, presence or strength of feedback loops), or uncertainty in the shape of relationships (e.g., linear, U-shaped, sigmoid).…”
Section: Original Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stakeholders often possess a diversity of beliefs about the level of (un)desirability of various behaviors, acceptability of intervention, or even how best to intervene when prevention is agreed upon. Such disagreement plagues prevention science with what Vennix refers to as Bmessy problems^-Bless tangible, ill-defined strategic issues…that is, situations in which there are large differences of opinion on the problem or even on the question of whether there is a problem^ [68] (p.380). Several additional types of uncertainty that are important include: uncertainties in the data and evidence (e.g., natural variability, measurement, and sampling errors), uncertainty in the nature of causal relationships (e.g., causal mechanisms, association versus causality, strength of intervention effects, presence or strength of feedback loops), or uncertainty in the shape of relationships (e.g., linear, U-shaped, sigmoid).…”
Section: Original Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was consistent with findings in literature where facilitator skills were found to highly influence the ability to retain the interest of participants and provide equal opportunity for participants to contribute to discussion. This was in addition to holding specific roles that collectively encouraged a supportive and non-threatening learning environment (Richardson and Anderson, 1995;Vennix, 1999;Cash et al, 2006;Muro and Jeffrey, 2008).…”
Section: N=23mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These constructs are defined by an individual's "worldview", the problem structuring approach acknowledged these and worked with them #29 , #119, #120, #128, #134, #154, #190, #224, #238, #365 6 Messiness The problem context in which the problem structuring approach was used was recognised as messy|wicked|swampy following definitions such as contained in (Ackoff, 1979(Ackoff, , 1981Rittel & Webber, 1973;Rosenhead, 1992;Vennix, 1999) #22, #24, #40, #239…”
Section: Methodological Lessonsmentioning
confidence: 99%