[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume III: Decision Support
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.1989.49253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group operating systems for decision factories of the future: an extended relational GDSS architecture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From a research perspective, development and testing of group decision technologies (Shaw and Fox, 1993;Chen and Liou, 1991;Howorka et al, 1991;Goul, 1990;Goul et al, 1990;Eck et al, 1989;Richards, 1989;Dennis et al, 1988;Gallupe and DeSanctis, 1988;DeSanctis and Gallupe, 1987;DeSanctis and Dickson, 1987;Bui and [arke, 1986;Gray, 1986) during the last ten years have brought some enlightenment to difficulties in applying electronic communication technologies to coordinating distributed decision problems. Extensive experimentation in both university and organizational settings demonstrated success in automating group decision-making techniques, providing positive interventions and identifying architectural requirements of technologies to support multiple agents involved in cooperative processes.…”
Section: Historical Technological Basismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From a research perspective, development and testing of group decision technologies (Shaw and Fox, 1993;Chen and Liou, 1991;Howorka et al, 1991;Goul, 1990;Goul et al, 1990;Eck et al, 1989;Richards, 1989;Dennis et al, 1988;Gallupe and DeSanctis, 1988;DeSanctis and Gallupe, 1987;DeSanctis and Dickson, 1987;Bui and [arke, 1986;Gray, 1986) during the last ten years have brought some enlightenment to difficulties in applying electronic communication technologies to coordinating distributed decision problems. Extensive experimentation in both university and organizational settings demonstrated success in automating group decision-making techniques, providing positive interventions and identifying architectural requirements of technologies to support multiple agents involved in cooperative processes.…”
Section: Historical Technological Basismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…055 are being used to assist management in solving a variety of semistructured problems including scheduling, stock trading, strategic planning, etc. In addition to classical individual user 055, other types of decision support systems have been implemented including executive information systems (EIS), group decision support systems (GDSS) (Chen and Liou, 1991;Howorka et al, 1991;Goul et al, 1990;Eck et al, 1989;Richards, 1989;]arvenpaa et al, 1988;Crowston and Malone, 1988;DeSanctis and Gallupe, 1987;Dennis et al, 1988;Malone et al, 1987;Huber, 1984), active/symbiotic decision support systems (ADSS) (Dalal and Kasper, 1991;Manheim et al, 1991;Castillo et al, 1991;Raghavan, 1991;Papazoglou et al, 1991;Raghavan, 1990;Mili and Rada, 1990;Manheim et al, 1990;Mastaglio, 1990;Manheim, 1989;Mili, 1989;Raghavan and Chand, 1989;Mili, 1988;Raghavan, 1984), and knowledge-based systems (KBS) (Goul et al, 1992). Anyone or all of these types of systems are present in today's organizations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The composition of these groups reflect the structure of the parent organization, wherein individual s might participate in any one of a number of groups based on their position within the organization [5] . This dynamic formation of groups requires the use of multicast addresses when performing broadcas t functions.…”
Section: Asynchronous Messagin Gmentioning
confidence: 99%