Group-size effects on virus prevalence depend on the presence of an invasive species

Moore, Amy T.; O’Brien, Valerie; Brown, Charles R.

doi:10.1007/s00265-021-03040-1

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 84 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Finding that group size explained more variation than social structure metrics disagrees with the expectations from the metaanalyses (Lucatelli et al 2020), and the study itself disagreed with earlier findings in the same species (Wascher et al 2019). Moreover, many individual studies find context-dependent effects: for example, a recent analysis of Buggy Creek virus (BCRV) in swallows found positive group size effects in monospecific groups and negative group size effects in mixed flocks (Moore et al 2021). This substantial between-system and between-study variation is a testament to the complexity of socialitydisease relationships, and implies that there is plenty of testable variation in these relationships that might be explained by between-system differences.…”

Section: A the Evidence For Density Dependencementioning

confidence: 80%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Density dependence and disease dynamics: moving towards a predictive framework

Albery¹

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

High population density is thought to exacerbate parasite exposure rates, leading to increased transmission and greater disease burdens. Different types of interactions exhibit different relationships with density, and therefore so do parasites that are spread by these interactions. Epidemiological models often assume a given density-transmission relationship, and the validity of this assumption impacts the accuracy of a model’s predictions. Despite its foundational relevance to epidemiology and disease ecology, density-transmission functions are generally identified post hoc rather than being predictable in advance. Developing a framework for predicting the shape and slope of these relationships could expedite epidemiological responses and improve ecological understanding. Such a framework must allow for both positive and negative correlations between density and infection, originating from non-linear changes in exposure, susceptibility, and a range of other confounders. Here, I argue that a general predictive framework is possible, built “bottom-up” from analyses of spatial and social behaviours. To lay the foundation, I define density dependence according to both spatial and social dimensions of behaviour, I present a series of challenges to address, and I outline a coherent integrative framework to conceptualise and understand density dependence of infection. Finally, I present suggestions for future work, including the collection, mining, and collation of cross-system behavioural and infection data, and experimental approaches that would allow us to extricate density’s effects from those of population size and a range of other confounders. Implementing these investigations may allow us to anticipate the epidemiological properties of a wide range of known and unknown parasites, as well as informing the uncertain future of human and animal disease in a rapidly changing and ever-densifying world.

show abstract

Section: A the Evidence For Density Dependencementioning

confidence: 80%

“…This transmission is then diluted in high-density areas such that each individual has a lower parasite burden, in the same way as encounter-dilution effects (e.g. (Moore et al 2021)).…”

Section: Interspecific Encounter-dilution Effects E (-)mentioning

confidence: 99%