Group structural elements in e-Government strategy formulation at local municipal level in South Africa

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to identify group structural elements that should be assessed in e-Government strategy formulation processes at local government level for service delivery in South Africa. These elements influence the success or effectiveness of the strategy formulation process. Design/methodology/approach The theoretical framework of group structural elements by Asplund and nine other strategy formulation-related approaches are reflected upon. Weick’s approach of theory development is used to guide the theoretical analysis. A pragmatic approach is applied to conduct the empirical investigation using a case study of a digital citizen engagement project in South Africa. Findings The paper highlights the following group elements that influence the strategy formulation process: group member relations, degree of differentiation within the group and resources of the group. Not addressing these structural elements may result in a lack of creativity or a reluctance to participate in the context of public sector engagement. Research limitations/implications The paper does not provide an exhaustive list of all aspects that necessitate assessment before and during a strategy formulation process, for example, organisational and environment structural elements. Practical implications Assessing group structural elements provides valuable knowledge on how to engage stakeholders in a joint problem-solving activity. This is particularly pertinent where citizen engagement is fundamental to addressing basic service delivery concerns. Originality/value In the South African local municipal context, there is no existing literature that discusses the need to assess group structural elements influencing the outcome of an e-Government strategy formulation process.

Managing Workplace Skills Development during the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…Literature reviewed showed that the various studies carried out focused on business that did not partake in the NSDP and the results showed that the strategy remained a challenge in many industries, namely: a. Government sectors [24,25], b. SMMEs [26] c. The insurance industry [27], d. The tourism industry [28], e. Selected strategic leaders in the 2006 Financial Mail Top 200 companies [29], and f. The banking industry [30] Besides the audited report by the Department of Education, a recent study which focused on businesses that are participating in the training programme which provided evidence and gave insight on the possible reasons for the low skills output. The following were the possible reasons for the lower-than-expected skills output [31]: In South Africa, there exists a knowledge gap in terms of understanding the reasons why training consistently fail to increase skills output as expected and the recent study [31] partly closed the information gap by identifying processes that could be attributed to the low skills output.…”

Designing strategy formulation in the midst of uncertainty in digital citizen engagement: A critical reflection of the application of Design Science Research augmented by Soft Systems Methodology to the design of strategy formulation

“…Dealing with the highlighted non‐tech aspects of a civic tech initiative raises key questions about how to strategize for such projects. Admittedly, creating strategies for such projects can be a daunting task, primarily due to the heterogenous mix of stakeholders whose views must inform the potential strategy (Asplund, 1975; Brugha & Varvasovszky, 2000; Enserink et al, 2010; Osah & Khene, 2018). Osah and Pade‐Khene (2020) focuses on the development of a framework to underpin strategy formulation for civic tech projects in under‐resourced local governments in the global south.…”