2020
DOI: 10.1037/pst0000293
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group therapy for schizophrenia: A meta-analysis.

Abstract: The effectiveness of group treatments for people with schizophrenia has not been examined on symptomspecific (positive and negative symptoms) outcomes, and the differential effects of the most popular group treatments remain unknown. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that tested (a) the effectiveness of 7 frequently used group treatments on positive and negative symptoms and (b) if treatmentspecific outcome improvement was associated with improvement on schizophrenia symptoms. Major … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
54
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
4
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It offers an acceptable and accessible form of treatment for many, and has the potential to be useful during the most active phase of treatment, as well as in supporting progress beyond periods of intensive support (Ben-Zeev, Buck, Kopelovich, & Meller, 2019). From a service standpoint, groups in general are cost-effective and commonplace in behavioural health, with high levels of acceptance among staff and participants (Burlingame, Svien, Hoppe, Hunt, & Rosendahl, 2020). The virtual format also could integrate across clinics for larger numbers, which has the potential to greatly expand access to FEP treatment in underserved areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It offers an acceptable and accessible form of treatment for many, and has the potential to be useful during the most active phase of treatment, as well as in supporting progress beyond periods of intensive support (Ben-Zeev, Buck, Kopelovich, & Meller, 2019). From a service standpoint, groups in general are cost-effective and commonplace in behavioural health, with high levels of acceptance among staff and participants (Burlingame, Svien, Hoppe, Hunt, & Rosendahl, 2020). The virtual format also could integrate across clinics for larger numbers, which has the potential to greatly expand access to FEP treatment in underserved areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is strong empirical support for social skills training for persons with serious mental health conditions (Burlingame et al, 2020). Such interventions support the development and generalization of social skills through psychoeducation and experiential practice.…”
Section: Resilience Intervention Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodological shortcomings of initial empirical investigations of group-level treatments were substantial-so much so that only guarded conclusions could be offered about efficacy-but in the last 25 years researchers have repeatedly demonstrated the effectiveness of group psychotherapies in methodologically rigorous studies. Meta-analytic reviews support the use of group therapy for helping people deal with traumatic experiences, depression, thought and mood disorders, social phobia, obsessive-compulsive tendencies, bulimia nervosa, binge eating, substance-related problems, trauma, and the psychological complexities of physical illnesses (e.g., Barkowski et al, 2016;Burlingame et al, 2003Burlingame et al, , 2020Janis et al, 2021;McRoberts et al, 1998).…”
Section: Cohesion and Group Psychotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%