2014
DOI: 10.4088/jcp.13m08964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group Treatment for Trichotillomania

Abstract: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01968343.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results for the participants with SPD are in line with previous meta-analyses (Schumer et al, 2016;Selles et al, 2016), whereas the effect size of the primary outcome measure for TTM is somewhat lower than in prior studies (McGuire et al, 2014;Slikboer et al, 2017). Posttreatment outcomes in the study are comparable to other studies of behavior group therapy for TTM (Diefenbach et al, 2006;Toledo et al, 2015) and to outcomes in individual behavior therapy for SPD (Schuck et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The results for the participants with SPD are in line with previous meta-analyses (Schumer et al, 2016;Selles et al, 2016), whereas the effect size of the primary outcome measure for TTM is somewhat lower than in prior studies (McGuire et al, 2014;Slikboer et al, 2017). Posttreatment outcomes in the study are comparable to other studies of behavior group therapy for TTM (Diefenbach et al, 2006;Toledo et al, 2015) and to outcomes in individual behavior therapy for SPD (Schuck et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, compared with other group studies, our results indicate that ACT-enhanced BT might be superior to BT or CBT, as our one-year follow-up effect size (ES=1.76) on the MGH-HS was larger than the pre-post effect size (ES=1.02) reported by Diefenbach et al (2006) at 6-month follow-up for the BT condition. Moreover, our post-treatment effect size was somewhat larger than the 1.35 effect size of the CBT condition in the study of Toledo et al (2015). It should be noted that Diefenbach and colleagues reported an effect size of 1.39, but when using pooled standard deviations, as we did in our study, we computed an effect size of 1.02 for their data.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Despite promising evidence in studies of group BT (Mouton and Stanley, 1996, Diefenbach et al, 2006, Toledo et al, 2015, there is preliminary evidence that group BT in the long-term is not superior to an active control (Diefenbach et al, 2006). In the one study, to examine the long-term impact of group BT, Diefenbach et al (2006) compared BT to supportive therapy, provided over 8 weeks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 CBT to be significantly more effective than group support therapy. 24 T A B L E 1 Clinical differentials for TTM 1,2,5,6,9,11,12…”
Section: The Genetics Of Ttmmentioning
confidence: 99%