2010
DOI: 10.2178/jsl/1286198157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grouplike minimal sets in ACFA AND inTA

Abstract: This paper began as a generalization of a part of the author's PhD thesis about ACFA and ended up with a characterization of groups definable in T A . The thesis concerns minimal formulae of the form x ∈ A ∧ σ(x) = f (x) for an algebraic curve A and a dominant rational function f : A → σ(A).These are shown to be uniform in the Zilber trichotomy, and the pairs (A, f ) that fall into each of the three cases are characterized. These characterizations are definable in families. This paper covers approximately half… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conclusion from Theorem 1.2 covers the main result of Medvedev’s PhD thesis [Med07] (whose main findings were published in [MS14, Proposition 2.21]) who showed that any invariant subvariety under the coordinatewise action of non-exceptional rational functions must have the form (1.3.1). Our result is stronger than the results from [Med07, MS14] since we only assume that a subvariety contains a Zariski dense set of preperiodic points under the action of and then we derive that must have the form (1.3.1) (see also our Theorem 1.4). Medvedev and Scanlon assume that is invariant by (or more generally, preperiodic under the action of ) and then using the model theory of difference fields, they conclude that must have the form (1.3.1).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The conclusion from Theorem 1.2 covers the main result of Medvedev’s PhD thesis [Med07] (whose main findings were published in [MS14, Proposition 2.21]) who showed that any invariant subvariety under the coordinatewise action of non-exceptional rational functions must have the form (1.3.1). Our result is stronger than the results from [Med07, MS14] since we only assume that a subvariety contains a Zariski dense set of preperiodic points under the action of and then we derive that must have the form (1.3.1) (see also our Theorem 1.4). Medvedev and Scanlon assume that is invariant by (or more generally, preperiodic under the action of ) and then using the model theory of difference fields, they conclude that must have the form (1.3.1).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Applying the rigidity of the symmetries of the Julia set on the one-dimensional slices, we are able to derive the rigidity of the symmetries of the entire -current, from which we derive the desired conclusion regarding and the dynamical system (see the proof of Theorem 6.1). It is precisely the study of the rigidity of this -current (for ) which provides the new proof of Medvedev’s result [Med07], which otherwise could not have been obtained from the arguments from our previous paper [GNY17].…”
Section: Reduction To the Case Of Hypersurfacesmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation