2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11856-017-1450-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Groups in NTP2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the theory VFA 0 of a non-standard Frobenius on an algebraically closed valued field of characteristic zero [CH14]. See also [CKS15] and [HO15] for some general results about groups and fields definable in NTP 2 structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the theory VFA 0 of a non-standard Frobenius on an algebraically closed valued field of characteristic zero [CH14]. See also [CKS15] and [HO15] for some general results about groups and fields definable in NTP 2 structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other algebraic examples of NTP 2 structures were identified recently, including bounded pseudo real closed and pseudo p-adically closed fields [15], certain model complete multivalued fields [13] and certain valued difference fields, e.g., the theory VFA 0 of a nonstandard Frobenius on an algebraically closed valued field of characteristic zero [6]. See also [7] and [12] for some general results about groups and fields definable in NTP 2 structures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A couple of important facts are known: over extension bases, forking equals dividing ( [CK12]) and the non-forking ideal is S1 ( [BYC14]). In addition, some theorems on groups generalizing similar results for simple and NIP theories have been proved: Hempel and Onshuus [HO17] construct definable envelopes for abelian and solvable subgroups; [CKS15] studies chain conditions and [MOS16] sets the foundations for the theory of definably amenable NTP 2 groups. More recently [KS17] explores analogues of some NIP-like phenomena.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the assumption of groups or fields, more has been done. See for example [CKS15] (about groups and fields in general NTP 2 ), [HO17] (about definable envelopes of subgroups), and more recently [MOS16] (about groups definable in bounded PRC fields).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%