We generalize Cremmer-Julia 1st order action of N = 8 supergravity with manifest E 7(7) symmetry to cases of N = 6 with manifest SO * (12) and N = 5 with manifest SU (1, 5) duality symmetries. These U dualities belong to groups of type E7 which do not admit a symmetric bilinear invariant for vector fields. Therefore the 2d order classical action derived from the one with manifest E7 type duality has a ghost vector field which, under appropriate boundary conditions, decouples. We show that when classical N ≥ 5 supergravities are deformed by a candidate UV divergence the ghost field does not decouple. Therefore we argue that U duality and supersymmetry suggest an explanation of the mysterious cancellation of UV infinities at L = 4, N = 5 in d=4. The same reasoning implies that, in absence of duality and supersymmetry anomalies, which still require a better understanding, N ≥ 5 perturbative supergravities may be UV finite at higher-loops.1 For N ≤ 3 G-duality groups might be degenerate, when the quartic invariant degenerates into a perfect square. But these models have G-duality anomalies anyway, as shown in [12], and are not expected to be fully protected by G-duality against UV divergences.2 We discuss the current status of anomalies in supergravities in Appendix B. 3 N ≤ 4 supergravities interacting with matter are discussed in Appendix C.-2 -6 loop order, based on supersymmetry and E 7(7) symmetry. This explains the computations in [23,24] which have shown UV finiteness at 3 and 4 loops. But the prediction of [22] is still to be confirmed at 5 and 6 loops in N = 8 d=4. The analysis in [22], based on soft limit on scalars due to E 7(7) symmetry, is inconclusive starting from 7 loops.Meanwhile for N = 8 other arguments were given about all-loop finiteness based on the light-cone formalism [25]. It is interesting that the light-cone finiteness argument in [25] was not disputed, but the light-cone candidate counterterms at loop order L were not constructed either. Therefore they are not known to exists in N = 8 supergravity. A consistent supersymmetric reduction to N = 5, 6 was not studied so far.A different argument about finiteness of N = 8 supergravity is based on E 7(7) symmetry in the vector sector of the theory [14,15]. The E 7(7) symmetry argument in [14,15] was disputed by BN in [13], where a proposal was made that the E 7(7) symmetry can be restored even in presence of the candidate counterterms. The proposal is based on a construction of the source of deformation, defined in details in [26]. The source of deformation has a manifest E 7(7) symmetry, where instead of a physical vector in representation 28, 28 of SU (8) one has to use a symplectic doublet with twice as many vector fields. An improved version of this proposal for U (1) duality group was developed in [26] and it was applied to the Born-Infeld theory, as well as Born-Infeld theory with higher derivatives [27,28]. The proof of consistency of the deformation proposal in bosonic theory was given in [13] only at a base point of the moduli space, whe...