2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2018.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Groups whose degree graph has three independent vertices

Abstract: Let G be a finite group, and let cd(G) denote the set of degrees of the irreducible complex characters of G. This paper is a contribution to the study of the degree graph of G, that is, the prime graph built on the set cd(G). Namely, we characterize finite groups whose degree graph has three independent vertices (i.e., three vertices that are pairwise non-adjacent). Our result turns out to be a generalization of several previously-known theorems concerning the structure of the degree graph.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But L 2 (7) has non-cyclic subgroups of order 21, a contradiction (subgroups of order pq of a Frobenius complement are cyclic). Thus, we conclude that H ≃ L 2 (8). Proof.…”
Section: About Condition N Qmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…But L 2 (7) has non-cyclic subgroups of order 21, a contradiction (subgroups of order pq of a Frobenius complement are cyclic). Thus, we conclude that H ≃ L 2 (8). Proof.…”
Section: About Condition N Qmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In other words, if λ ∈ M \ {1 M }, then I H (λ) contains both a Sylow t 2 -subgroup and a Sylow t 3subgroup of H as normal subgroups, and these Sylow subgroups are abelian; in particular, H has abelian Hall {t 2 , t 3 }-subgroups, and the same clearly holds for every normal section of H. Take now a minimal normal subgroup N of H which is simple and such that {t 2 , t 3 } ⊆ π(|H : C H (N )|), as in the third paragraph of this proof; we have that H/C H (N ) is an almost-simple group with abelian Hall {t 2 , t 3 }-subgroups, such that t 2 and t 3 are nonadjacent vertices of ∆(H/C H (N )). This contradicts Proposition 2.8(b) of [8], and the desired conclusion follows.…”
Section: Two Special Casesmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations