“…(i) Let X = (1, 2, 3), (1, 2)(4, 5) ; in particular, X Sym(3). Let g be the permutation (1, 4) (2,5,3,6). The subgroup…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, PSL(4, 2) Alt( 8) is contained in PSL(5, 2) as a subgroup. Again by Lemma 2.5, the only possibility left is PSL (3,2), but this is isomorphic to PSL(2, 7) which has only pronormal or abelian subgroups (see [3,Proposition 4]).…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this work, finite simple groups whose nonpronormal subgroups are abelian have been classified in [3]. Actually, finite soluble groups whose nonabelian subgroups are pronormal began to be studied in [2,12] with the aim of expanding well-known structural theorems concerning metahamiltonian groups (that is, groups whose proper subgroups are either abelian or normal) to larger classes of groups (see also [8,10,11] for other generalisations of this type) and these results were applied to obtain the results in [3]. Here, we propose a different approach which does not rely on the complex study of the structure of finite soluble groups with only abelian or pronormal subgroups and makes it possible to characterise which finite simple groups have only pronormal or nilpotent subgroups.…”
A subgroup H of a group G is said to be pronormal in G if each of its conjugates
$H^g$
in G is already conjugate to it in the subgroup
$\langle H,H^g\rangle $
. The aim of this paper is to classify those (locally) finite simple groups which have only nilpotent or pronormal subgroups.
“…(i) Let X = (1, 2, 3), (1, 2)(4, 5) ; in particular, X Sym(3). Let g be the permutation (1, 4) (2,5,3,6). The subgroup…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, PSL(4, 2) Alt( 8) is contained in PSL(5, 2) as a subgroup. Again by Lemma 2.5, the only possibility left is PSL (3,2), but this is isomorphic to PSL(2, 7) which has only pronormal or abelian subgroups (see [3,Proposition 4]).…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this work, finite simple groups whose nonpronormal subgroups are abelian have been classified in [3]. Actually, finite soluble groups whose nonabelian subgroups are pronormal began to be studied in [2,12] with the aim of expanding well-known structural theorems concerning metahamiltonian groups (that is, groups whose proper subgroups are either abelian or normal) to larger classes of groups (see also [8,10,11] for other generalisations of this type) and these results were applied to obtain the results in [3]. Here, we propose a different approach which does not rely on the complex study of the structure of finite soluble groups with only abelian or pronormal subgroups and makes it possible to characterise which finite simple groups have only pronormal or nilpotent subgroups.…”
A subgroup H of a group G is said to be pronormal in G if each of its conjugates
$H^g$
in G is already conjugate to it in the subgroup
$\langle H,H^g\rangle $
. The aim of this paper is to classify those (locally) finite simple groups which have only nilpotent or pronormal subgroups.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.