2008
DOI: 10.1086/525507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growing Church Organizations in Diverse U.S. Communities, 1890–1926

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All else being equal, counties with greater religious diversity are more likely to experience smaller future gains or larger future declines in the percent of the population who are church adherents. Although our results are limited to the most recent decades in just one country, they match the negative effects of religious diversity discovered by Koçak and Carroll (2008) in their longitudinal analysis of late 19th and early 20th century cities in the United States. Moreover, we find that our results are robust to the addition of control variables and different ways of calculating pluralism (using adherents, congregations, denominations, whole religious traditions, and even excluding large sectors of adherents, e.g., excluding all Catholics or all white evangelical Protestants).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…All else being equal, counties with greater religious diversity are more likely to experience smaller future gains or larger future declines in the percent of the population who are church adherents. Although our results are limited to the most recent decades in just one country, they match the negative effects of religious diversity discovered by Koçak and Carroll (2008) in their longitudinal analysis of late 19th and early 20th century cities in the United States. Moreover, we find that our results are robust to the addition of control variables and different ways of calculating pluralism (using adherents, congregations, denominations, whole religious traditions, and even excluding large sectors of adherents, e.g., excluding all Catholics or all white evangelical Protestants).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A large literature in economics and a growing literature in sociology (e.g. England, Allison and Wu 2007;Jacobs and Carmichael 2001;Jacobs and Tope 2007;Kocak and Carroll 2008;Mouw 2003;Schneiberg, King and Smith 2008) uses fixed effects methods to control for time-invariant unobserved heterogeneity. 2 These models, which require treatment variation within units over time, remove confounding bias that can emerge from omitted observable, mismeasured, or unobservable timeinvariant student or group characteristics (Allison 2009;Halaby 2004;Mouw 2006;Wooldridge 2003).…”
Section: Alternative Designs Of Contextual Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…“[T]he turn of the 20th century … is commonly thought to be a critical time in the development of American religion” (Koçak and Carroll :1275). I collected the best available sources on Jewish denominational decision making from 1910 to 1955 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%