Growing Talent for Inclusion: using an appreciative inquiry approach into investigating classroom dynamics

Abstract

This paper reports on an Appreciative Inquiry project called ‘Growing Talent for Inclusion’ which has been running since 2002. The project grew out the authors’ work in a Local Authority Support Service assisting schools to meet the needs of pupils with a range of additional educational needs. Faced with a large number of individual referrals, many relating to the emotional, social and behavioural needs of pupils, it was considered that an eco – systemic approach was required and that a priority was to support pupils and teachers in developing more effective and satisfying interpersonal relationships in the classroom. ‘Growing Talent for Inclusion’ uses Appreciative Inquiry to investigate a management change process which has been used within large organisations and communities but less commonly at classroom level. It is a type of action research which is solution not problem focused and therefore lends itself well to a research focus of improving classroom dynamics. The paper introduces a 4‐D Cycle of Appreciative Inquiry: discovery, dream, design and deliver, as advocated by Cooperrider and Srivastva, 1987, which guides the identification, acknowledgment and amplification of skills pertinent to improving social dynamics within the classroom and discusses the methodological issues which arise from this collaborative, participative form of inquiry. A combination of qualitative and quantitative methods has been used to identify and track the development of attributes for improving working relationships in four different primary and secondary classrooms in three schools. 76 pupils and four teachers have been involved in the project since its inception in 2002 with classes in a further three primary schools using the approach during the academic year 2005–2006. Findings from the project show an increase in the number of pupils with whom other pupils are happy to work, a reduction in the number of pupils identified as socially excluded at the beginning of the project and enhanced capacity of the group in terms of the talents identified for growth. Feedback from staff and students also suggests that the process of noticing and acknowledging strengths has contributed to improvements in working relationships.

Defining Happiness for Young Adults With Schizophrenia: A Building Block for Recovery

“…The Valeo Dialogue on Health and Care (Grossman, Rudman, Suchman, Arthur, Ion, & Litt, 2002), demonstrated the utility of AI for defining a concept to meet the health care needs of a population. More recently, studies from 2006–2009 have shown potential for use of AI to increase social inclusion, well-being, collaboration and innovation (Doveston & Keenaghan, 2006; Hazard, Callister, Birkhead and Nichols, 2009; Reed, Richardson, Marais, & Moyle, 2008; Richie, & Marichionni, 2009). Because of AI’s success in engaging participants, it is ideal for inviting and maintaining participation of young adults with SCZ, who often isolate and are fearful of social situations.…”

Evidence-Based Approaches in Positive Education

“…Evidence for the effectiveness of AI has been found in both large and small organizations, using outcome measures such as increased stock prices, increased employee morale, increased customer satisfaction, enhanced productivity, increased levels of communication, decreased turnover, increased creativity, and decreased union action (Berrisford 2005;Cooperrider and Srivastva 1987;Cooperrider et al 2003;McKenzie 2003;Niemann 2010). Doveston and Keenaghan (2006), Schiller (2003), and argue that AI is useful for many of the contemporary challenges in educational administration, including school improvement, capacity-building and distributed leadership. In 2004, Lehner and Ruona found very limited use of AI in educational settings; however, more recent research suggests that it is gaining acceptance as a change method in schools (Doveston and Keenaghan 2006;Dickerson and Helm-Stevens 2011).…”

“…Doveston and Keenaghan (2006), Schiller (2003), and argue that AI is useful for many of the contemporary challenges in educational administration, including school improvement, capacity-building and distributed leadership. In 2004, Lehner and Ruona found very limited use of AI in educational settings; however, more recent research suggests that it is gaining acceptance as a change method in schools (Doveston and Keenaghan 2006;Dickerson and Helm-Stevens 2011).…”

Case study of a school wellbeing initiative: Using appreciative inquiry to support positive change

“…In complement to the ideas above, many prominent writers in the field of school culture suggest that staff agency is a necessary condition for creating school change (Elmore, 2000;Fullan, 2001;Heck & Hallinger, 2009). Finally, a growing number of researchers are also calling for the application of appreciative-based techniques to create cultural change in schools (Calabrese, Hester, Friesen, & Burkhalter, 2010;Dickerson & Helm-Stevens, 2011;Doveston & Keenaghan, 2006;Willoughby & Tosey, 2007). Hoy and Tarter (2011) argue that strengths-based approaches offer important new ways to assist schools to build administrative structures, processes, policies, and practices that enable a positive institution.…”