Growing together: An analysis of measurement transparency across 15 years of player motivation questionnaires

The Systematic Review-lution: A Manifesto to Promote Rigour and Inclusivity in Research Synthesis

“…Yet empirical work in HCI-viewed across the field as a whole-is disparate; how we report is varied and sometimes spotty. This is certainly not a novel criticism; we echo calls from other researchers who are critically reflecting on our research reporting practices, e.g., with regards to the reporting of race and ethnicity data [14], brain signal experiment data [68], participant compensation data [65], inter-rater reliability in qualitative research [57], specific measures [71] and questionnaires [43,47], engagement with self-determination theory [81], artifact descriptions [33], and inferential statistics [12], to list just a few. These issues may arise in part due to page limits or efforts to ensure paper length matches perceived contribution, but may also be due to lack of community-driven standardization and education.…”