1976
DOI: 10.1086/336858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth and Cell Pattern Formation on an Axis: Critique of Concepts, Terminology, and Modes of Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
163
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
163
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2). Within each domain, different relationships between relative elongation and cell division rates (Green, 1976) or DLPs cause a change in the mean cell length. We have found that on average the PD DLP is equal to zero and the TD DLP is greater than zero (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). Within each domain, different relationships between relative elongation and cell division rates (Green, 1976) or DLPs cause a change in the mean cell length. We have found that on average the PD DLP is equal to zero and the TD DLP is greater than zero (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle, either parameter could have been reduced by phosphorus stress or maintained by ethylene; however, indirect evidence implicates the number of cells rather than their division rate. Under steady-state conditions, cell division rate must be in equilibrium with relative elongation rate, otherwise cell size would progressively increase or decrease, leading to non-steady-state behavior (Green, 1976). Relative elongation rate in the meristem was not changed by phosphorus stress, and roots grew at steady state for days; consequently, we deduce that cell division rate was unchanged by phosphorus stress and that the effects of phosphorus availability and ethylene action on cell flux were mediated by the number of dividing epidermal cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bichet et al, 2001). Cell shape is formed by division as well as expansion; therefore, static images of meristem cell shape reveal nothing about expansion anisotropy (Green, 1976;Baskin and Beemster, 1998).…”
Section: Growth Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%