2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.07.096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth and characterization of chemical-vapor-deposited zinc oxide nanorods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[23][24][25] We have encountered two main difficulties in studying the Au-ZnO epitaxial relationship, specifically; ͑a͒ the rather large size and consequent opacity to electrons of the ϳ100 nm thick Au dots and ͑b͒ the low fraction of VLS grown ZnO NR with Au droplets. Due to the consequent scarcity of data we must regard the conclusions above as tentative, and work is continuing to fully understand the nature of the epitaxial relationships between Au droplets and VLS grown ZnO NR.…”
Section: Temmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24][25] We have encountered two main difficulties in studying the Au-ZnO epitaxial relationship, specifically; ͑a͒ the rather large size and consequent opacity to electrons of the ϳ100 nm thick Au dots and ͑b͒ the low fraction of VLS grown ZnO NR with Au droplets. Due to the consequent scarcity of data we must regard the conclusions above as tentative, and work is continuing to fully understand the nature of the epitaxial relationships between Au droplets and VLS grown ZnO NR.…”
Section: Temmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in attaining the right dimensions and morphologies, a control synthesis procedure for the production of 1D nanoscale ZnO must be sought and optimised. Various methods such as thermal evaporation [10], hydrothermal process [11], microemulsion growth [12], chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [13], and metal-organic CVD [14] have been applied to grow 1D ZnO nanostructures. Nevertheless, most of these methods suffer from two shortcomings: firstly, they require extreme conditions and expensive equipment; and also they are not suitable for controllable synthesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…nanorods, nanowires and nanobelts, become one of the major focuses, and demonstrate potential in various fields, including light emitting diodes (C. H. Liu et al, 2003;Willander et al, 2009), Schottky diode (Nam, Baek, & Park, 2014), field-effect transistor (Schneider et al, 2010), UV sensor (Lai, Wang, Zhao, Fong, & Zhu, 2013), solar cells (Law, Greene, Johnson, Saykally, & Yang, 2005), and photocatalysts (Y. S. Liu, Han, Qiu, & Gao, 2012). Up to now, different experimental techniques have been used for synthesis ZnO nanorods arrays, including, pulsed laser deposition (PLD) (Yu et al, 2008), electrochemical deposition (Guo, Zhou, & Lin, 2008), molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) (Robin et al, 2009), sputtering (Z. , vapor phase transport (VPT) (Li, You, Duan, Shi, & Qin, 2004), thermal evaporation (Ahn, Han, Kong, & Cho, 2009) and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) (Wu et al, 2006). However, these techniques usually require high operation temperature and expensive equipment, which are not compatible with organic substrates for implementations in flexible and wearable electronics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%