Molecular Beam Epitaxy 2018
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-812136-8.00019-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth and Characterization of Fullerene/GaAs Interfaces and C 60 -Doped GaAs and AlGaAs Layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the active region has an effective smaller bandgap compared to the cladding layers and vice versa, its refractive index is slightly greater than that of the adjacent layers. The gallium arsenide effective refractive index at these wavelengths is larger when compared to the refractive index of the aluminum gallium arsenide cladding layers [11][12][13]37,38].…”
Section: Crystals Of Aluminum Gallium Arsenidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the active region has an effective smaller bandgap compared to the cladding layers and vice versa, its refractive index is slightly greater than that of the adjacent layers. The gallium arsenide effective refractive index at these wavelengths is larger when compared to the refractive index of the aluminum gallium arsenide cladding layers [11][12][13]37,38].…”
Section: Crystals Of Aluminum Gallium Arsenidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the GaP, which causes a lattice mismatch (3.57 %) to (Al)GaAs, is no more useful for reflective (Al)GaAs based IR-LEDs owing to the use of the insulators for reflective structures [ 15 ]. A lattice mismatch between Al x Ga 1−x As (x = 0) and Al x Ga 1−x As(x = 1) is known as approximately under 0.5 % [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%