2011
DOI: 10.1603/en10111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth and Conidiation Response of Escovopsis weberi (Ascomycota: Hypocreales) Against the Fungal Cultivar of <I>Acromyrmex lundii</I> (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…and E. nivea inhibited the growth of L. gongylophorus. These results indicate the production of compounds by both fungi providing evidences for a chemical action of Escovopsis as proposed by Currie et al (2003), Reynolds and Currie (2004) and Folgarait et al (2011b), and hitherto demonstrate the chemical action of E. nivea. However, the extracts alone were not able to kill the mutualistic fungus, showing the need for a combined action of chemical and physical mechanisms for the establishment of mycoparasitism.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…and E. nivea inhibited the growth of L. gongylophorus. These results indicate the production of compounds by both fungi providing evidences for a chemical action of Escovopsis as proposed by Currie et al (2003), Reynolds and Currie (2004) and Folgarait et al (2011b), and hitherto demonstrate the chemical action of E. nivea. However, the extracts alone were not able to kill the mutualistic fungus, showing the need for a combined action of chemical and physical mechanisms for the establishment of mycoparasitism.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The fact that all Escovopsis spp. isolates have not grown on the control plate, but have grown into the mutualistic fungus is explained by the Escovopsis being attracted by chemical signals secreted by the mutualistic fungus, supporting the hypothesis of specificity of this interaction (Gerardo et al 2004(Gerardo et al , 2006Folgarait et al 2011b). This was particularly observed in the SEM preparations, in which Escovopsis did not exibit radial growth, but grew direct towards the mutualistic fungus, forming a bridge between the fungi.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…New queens vertically transmit the symbiotic fungus from parent to offspring colonies (Höldobler and Wilson 1990;Currie et al 1999 [449][450][451][452][453][454][455][456][457][458][459][460][461] All Attini fungal cultivars are asexual members of the Agaricales (Basidiomycota) (Singer 1986). Leaf-cutting ants cultivate species of Leucoagaricus such as L. gongylophorus and L. weberi, as well as other undefined morphotypes in the same genus (Singer 1986;Muchovej et al 1991;Folgarait et al 2011;Marfetán 2011;Lugo et al 2013). …”
Section: I�����������mentioning
confidence: 99%