“…There are also several other studies supporting these alternative mechanisms that ionospheric disturbances in ion temperatures, foF 2, and TEC had been observed prior to strong EQs around Japan (Karatay et al, 2010; Ouzounov et al, 2011; Oyama et al, 2016; Zolotov et al, 2013), Chile (Namgaladze et al, 2009; Yadav et al, 2015), Italy (Akhoondzadeh, 2016; Davidenko & Pulinets, 2019; Kouris et al, 2006; Pulinets, 1998), El‐Salvador (Plotkin, 1999), India (Trigunait et al, 2004), the United States (Kouris & Fotiadis, 2002; Pulinets et al, 2007), Mexico (Pulinets, 2004; Pulinets et al, 2004, 2005), Taiwan (Liu et al, 2000, 2004, 2010), Indonesia (Devi et al, 2013), Nepal (Li et al, 2016), China (Karatay et al, 2010; Zhang et al, 2004), and Turkey (Akyol, 2013; Akyol et al, 2013; Arikan et al, 2012). In these studies, statistical methods have been used for the identification of the influence of seismic activities on the ionospheric variations such as TEC difference and variation analysis (Arikan et al, 2012; Karatay et al, 2010; Namgaladze et al, 2009; Ouzounov et al, 2011; Plotkin, 1999; Yadav et al, 2015; Zolotov et al, 2013), equatorial TEC abnormality analysis (Devi et al, 2013), ionospheric correction Trigunait et al (2004), correlation analysis between TEC and foF2 or different pairs of GPS receivers (Pulinets, 2004; Pulinets et al, 2004, 2005, 2007), generation of ionospheric‐precursor masks based on variation of TEC and foF2 (Davidenko & Pulinets, 2019), interquartile range and percentage analysis (Liu et al, 2000, 2004, 2010, 2016; Oyama et al, 2016; Zhang et al, 2004), relative deviation of daily ionospheric parameters from their corresponding monthly medians (Kouris & Fotiadis, 2002; Kouris et ...…”