2013
DOI: 10.4236/pos.2013.43024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth and Inhibition of Equatorial Anomaly Prior to an Earthquake (EQ): Case Studies with Total Electron Content (TEC) Data for Major EQs of Japan 2011 and Indonesia 2012

Abstract: The processes leading to the growth and inhibition of equatorial anomaly before major earthquake (EQ) were viewed in this paper by examining global Total Electron Content (TEC) that contoured over longitude sectors covering Africa to Pacific, in association with EQ events of Japan (M = 9) that occurred at 135°E to 145°E and 35 Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simultaneous growth of strong EEA in the latitude zone of -5° N to 10° N and near the epicentre longitudes suggests coupling process between development of EEA and EEAC. The intense EEA at the night sector that was observed in presence of mid latitude earthquakes from TEC global data was suggested by Devi et al, [2013] to be due to the result of westward E-field enhanced by the EQ induced processes that propagates density to lower latitudes from mid latitude epicenter through downward drift. The increase in TEC at this longitude zone is further enhanced by EM focusing effect generated at the EEA location due to the presence of the distortion of earth magnetic field in this sector [Devi et al, 2013].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The simultaneous growth of strong EEA in the latitude zone of -5° N to 10° N and near the epicentre longitudes suggests coupling process between development of EEA and EEAC. The intense EEA at the night sector that was observed in presence of mid latitude earthquakes from TEC global data was suggested by Devi et al, [2013] to be due to the result of westward E-field enhanced by the EQ induced processes that propagates density to lower latitudes from mid latitude epicenter through downward drift. The increase in TEC at this longitude zone is further enhanced by EM focusing effect generated at the EEA location due to the presence of the distortion of earth magnetic field in this sector [Devi et al, 2013].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equatorial anomaly factor takes a key role in such changes specially when the epicentre lies near to the equator and at low latitudes [Depueva and Ratanova, 2001;Devi et al, 2001;Devi et al, 2004;Devi et al, 2011(b)] . In case of an EQ with epicentre at mid latitude, the equatorial anomaly effect may not be very effective but there are still evidences of growth of Earthquake time Equatorial Anomaly (EEA), significantly at the longitude zone of a mid-latitude EQ epicentre Devi et al, 2013;Ryu et al, 2014;Ryu et al, 2016]. Such modifications of anomaly prior to mid latitude EQs are also shown through model computation by Karpov et al, [2013].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is however important to examine association of orographic role on EQ time changes in atmospheric dynamics in enhancement of LOS path length in the environment taken under this study. This indeed is a difficult task as earthquake preparatory processes could cause diverse effects in the near Earth space and their manifestations are observed at the surface that may extend even up to the ionosphere [Depueva and Ruzhin 1995, Devi et al 2001, Liu et al 2001, Devi et al 2004, Parrot et al 2008, Devi et al 2013a, Devi et al 2013b. However, in the context of present observation, the atmospheric factors with reference to EQ-time drop in temperature will be specially discussed as this is one of the prime factors leading to changes in near Earth dynamics and also that in almost all the reported cases related to EQ induced temperature variations, be it surface temperature, the Sea Surface Temperature (SST) or Surface Latent Heat Flux (SLHF) [Qiang 1997, Tronin 2000, Tronin 2002, Dey and Singh 2003, Cervone et al 2004, Ouzonov et al 2007, Singh et al 2007, Alvan et al 2012, Goswami et al 2014], an increase in its value has been noted except a few cases [Singh et al 2010].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also several other studies supporting these alternative mechanisms that ionospheric disturbances in ion temperatures, foF 2, and TEC had been observed prior to strong EQs around Japan (Karatay et al, 2010; Ouzounov et al, 2011; Oyama et al, 2016; Zolotov et al, 2013), Chile (Namgaladze et al, 2009; Yadav et al, 2015), Italy (Akhoondzadeh, 2016; Davidenko & Pulinets, 2019; Kouris et al, 2006; Pulinets, 1998), El‐Salvador (Plotkin, 1999), India (Trigunait et al, 2004), the United States (Kouris & Fotiadis, 2002; Pulinets et al, 2007), Mexico (Pulinets, 2004; Pulinets et al, 2004, 2005), Taiwan (Liu et al, 2000, 2004, 2010), Indonesia (Devi et al, 2013), Nepal (Li et al, 2016), China (Karatay et al, 2010; Zhang et al, 2004), and Turkey (Akyol, 2013; Akyol et al, 2013; Arikan et al, 2012). In these studies, statistical methods have been used for the identification of the influence of seismic activities on the ionospheric variations such as TEC difference and variation analysis (Arikan et al, 2012; Karatay et al, 2010; Namgaladze et al, 2009; Ouzounov et al, 2011; Plotkin, 1999; Yadav et al, 2015; Zolotov et al, 2013), equatorial TEC abnormality analysis (Devi et al, 2013), ionospheric correction Trigunait et al (2004), correlation analysis between TEC and foF2 or different pairs of GPS receivers (Pulinets, 2004; Pulinets et al, 2004, 2005, 2007), generation of ionospheric‐precursor masks based on variation of TEC and foF2 (Davidenko & Pulinets, 2019), interquartile range and percentage analysis (Liu et al, 2000, 2004, 2010, 2016; Oyama et al, 2016; Zhang et al, 2004), relative deviation of daily ionospheric parameters from their corresponding monthly medians (Kouris & Fotiadis, 2002; Kouris et ...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%