1998
DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.1998.1030410.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth and physiology of aspen supplied with different fertilizer addition rates

Abstract: Isebrands, J. G. 1998. Growth and physiology of aspen supplied with different fertilizer addition rates. -Physiol. Plant. 103: 513-526.Variable internal plant nutrient content may confound plant response to environmental stress. Plant nutrient content may be controlled with relative addition rate techniques in solution culture. However, because raising large numbers of plants in flowing solution culture is difficult. we investieated the feasibihtv of raisine slants in soil rnk using relative fertilizer additio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3c). In agreement with Coleman et al [11] we think that the measurements obtained with the SPAD meter can be a useful technique to rapid estimate leaf N concentration and A max in poplar plantations.…”
Section: Hybrid Poplar Growth and Leaf Carbon Assimilationsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…3c). In agreement with Coleman et al [11] we think that the measurements obtained with the SPAD meter can be a useful technique to rapid estimate leaf N concentration and A max in poplar plantations.…”
Section: Hybrid Poplar Growth and Leaf Carbon Assimilationsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…A similar strong linear relationship was also reported between SPAD reading, leaf N concentration, and photosynthetic capacity in aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) [11]. This suggests that the SPAD meter holds promise for rapid and non-destructive assessment of foliar N, which can help to effectively monitor seedling nutritional status.…”
Section: Leaf Physiology and Nutritional Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional wet-chemistry techniques exist for assessing plant N status, which involves destructive sampling of plant materials [11,47]. These techniques are relatively expensive and laborious and therefore, not suitable for rapid appraisal of plant N status throughout the growing season.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we conclude that biomass accumulation does not favor shoots in developmentally equivalent stands grown with more favorable soil resources. Other attempts to compare developmentally equivalent stands also demonstrate that resource availability has little or no effect on relative belowground biomass accumulation in herbaceous plants (McConnaughay and Coleman, 1999), tree seedlings (Coleman et al, 1998;Drew and Ledig, 1980;Gebauer et al, 1996), or tree stands (Coleman et al, 2004a;King et al, 1999).…”
Section: Effects Of Resource Amendments On Biomass Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%