2017
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.607.410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth and Yield of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) as Influenced by Different Crop Establishment Methods and Nitrogen Levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The favourable effect of increased N supply on growth parameters such as plant height (cm) and tillers might be responsible for higher dry matter accumulation (g) of the crop. The results of the present study are in agreement with the findings of Pyngrope et al [15], Khatri et al [16] and Nissar et al [17].…”
Section: Growth Parameterssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The favourable effect of increased N supply on growth parameters such as plant height (cm) and tillers might be responsible for higher dry matter accumulation (g) of the crop. The results of the present study are in agreement with the findings of Pyngrope et al [15], Khatri et al [16] and Nissar et al [17].…”
Section: Growth Parameterssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Similar results were confirmed by Duttarganvi et al, (2014) reported that significantly higher tillers hill -1 (29), root length (31 cm), leaf area hill -1 (319 cm 2 ), panicles hill -1 (24) and grain yield (5.63 t ha -1 ) were recorded under SRI as compared to Normal Traditional Planting (NTP). The experiment finding of Pyngrope et al, (2017) revealed that SRI + 120 kg Nitrogen ha -1 significantly performed better than all other treatments viz; Number of effective tillers hill -1 (18.59), Number of grains panicle -1 (108.88), Length of panicle (27.90 cm), Test weight (24.82 g), Grain yield (5.34 t ha -1 ), Straw yield (10.26 t ha -1 ), Harvest index (34.23 %) and Protein content (8.37 %). SRI + 120 kg Nitrogen ha -1 recorded highest gross return (152600.00 Rs ha -1 ), net return (92077.92 Rs ha -1 ) and B: C ratio (2.52), however treatment (MTR + 120 kg Nitrogen ha -1 ), SRI + 60 kg Nitrogen ha -1 , SRI + 90 kg Nitrogen ha -1 and SRI + 120 kg Nitrogen ha -1 were statistically at par with treatment SRI + 120 kg Nitrogen ha -1 respectively Pyngrope et al, (2018)…”
Section: System Of Rice Intensificationmentioning
confidence: 99%