1989
DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-21-1-69
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth characteristics and lipid distribution in two lines of chicken selected for low or high abdominal fat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1983) found no evidence that selection in pigs for an index that included low backfat thickness caused relocation of body fat from subcutaneous to other sites in the body, but only a small reduction in total fat was achieved by selection. Selection for high and low abdominal fat in chickens produced a greater response in abdominal triglycerides than in total triglycerides, suggesting local control of fat deposition at different sites in chickens (Leclercq et al, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…(1983) found no evidence that selection in pigs for an index that included low backfat thickness caused relocation of body fat from subcutaneous to other sites in the body, but only a small reduction in total fat was achieved by selection. Selection for high and low abdominal fat in chickens produced a greater response in abdominal triglycerides than in total triglycerides, suggesting local control of fat deposition at different sites in chickens (Leclercq et al, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In broilers, feed efficiency may also be improved as a correlated response to selection for younger age at market weight. However, increasing body weight at a given age has several consequences such as increased fatness and maintenance cost at a given age [16,23]. Since regulations impose a minimum slaughter age of 81 d in "Label Rouge" chickens, selecting for increased growth rate is not permitted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indirect selection on correlated traits should therefore provide alternative selection strategies. The criteria to be considered for indirect selection may be abdominal fatness [16] as well as growth curve parameters, since lines selected on the shape of the growth curve exhibit different feed conversion ratios [26]. Furthermore, selection strategies to improve the feed conversion ratio have been investigated primarily for fast-growing broilers, and their application to slowgrowing label-type chickens may not be straightforward.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%