2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.05.335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth, coalescence, and electrical resistivity of thin Pt films grown by dc magnetron sputtering on SiO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the NiO layer does not significantly affect the Pt resistivity, the high crystalline quality of the NiO and Pt films deposited on Al 2 O 3 leads to a lower resistivity than the Si-based substrates. These resistivities are comparable to those obtained for Pt using similar fabrication methods and deposition conditions [46][47][48].…”
Section: Device Fabrication and Experimental Setupsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Although the NiO layer does not significantly affect the Pt resistivity, the high crystalline quality of the NiO and Pt films deposited on Al 2 O 3 leads to a lower resistivity than the Si-based substrates. These resistivities are comparable to those obtained for Pt using similar fabrication methods and deposition conditions [46][47][48].…”
Section: Device Fabrication and Experimental Setupsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…These observed resistivities of thin-film electrodes are comparable with previously [42,43], and indicate that the SRO and LNO layers in this study can be a good lattice matched metallic electrode for ferroelectric PZT oxide thin films. Finally we mention for reference that Pt thin film electrodes on Si substrates were found to have a room temperature resistivity in the range 0.18-0.21 mV cm [44,45], thus a factor 10 lower than the oxide electrode layers. Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Another category of in situ and real-time diagnostics is based on measuring the change of electrical and optical properties of the deposited layer as a function of time. Evolution of electrical properties (e.g., film resistivity) can be measured using four-point probe techniques [ 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ], while typical optical diagnostics include reflectance spectroscopy [ 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 ] and spectroscopic ellipsometry [ 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 ]. These techniques can characterize all relevant film-growth stages up to the formation of a continuous layer and beyond, while they provide morphological information over mesoscopic length scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%