2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.microrel.2017.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth competition between layer-type and porous-type Cu 3 Sn in microbumps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thickness of Cu 6 Sn 5 IMC in Cu/Sn-3.5Ag/Cu is smaller than Cu/Sn/Cu at the cold end, because Ag 3 Sn IMC can hinder the growth of Cu 6 Sn 5 IMC. The Cu 6 Sn 5 IMC was first formed at Cu/Sn-2.3Ag/ Cu interface and then transformed into Cu 3 Sn, because Cu 6 Sn 5 could not reach equilibrium with Cu [53]. Compared with the layer type of Cu 3 Sn, the porous type of Cu 3 Sn IMC has a larger specific surface area and higher surface energy, thus the layered structure could be formed firstly.…”
Section: Sn-agmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness of Cu 6 Sn 5 IMC in Cu/Sn-3.5Ag/Cu is smaller than Cu/Sn/Cu at the cold end, because Ag 3 Sn IMC can hinder the growth of Cu 6 Sn 5 IMC. The Cu 6 Sn 5 IMC was first formed at Cu/Sn-2.3Ag/ Cu interface and then transformed into Cu 3 Sn, because Cu 6 Sn 5 could not reach equilibrium with Cu [53]. Compared with the layer type of Cu 3 Sn, the porous type of Cu 3 Sn IMC has a larger specific surface area and higher surface energy, thus the layered structure could be formed firstly.…”
Section: Sn-agmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, it was concluded that the thickness of the Sn-based alloy used for the TLPB process should be relatively small in order to carry out the assembly in a reasonable processing time. This was the case for recent TLPB research works for microelectronic packaging [16][17][18][19] which have used Sn-based solder thicknesses lower than 10 lm. However, all these studies performed by using electrodeposited layers of Cu and solder alloys, report formation of mainly two key defects: classical Kirkendall voids at interface between Cu and IMCs and above all numerous porosities and very large cavities inside the joints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6] When the size of Cu pillar bumps reduces to several microns, the physical characteristics of the solder joint will change signi cantly, which raises new potential threats. [7,8] During the re ow and solid-state aging process, the excessive growth of intermetallic compound (IMC) would deplete the Sn solder [9]. Subsequently, abundant porous Cu 3 Sn is produced in the interface of Cu/Sn, [10,11,6] which decreases the mechanical strength of the solder joint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous literatures have pointed out that a porous-type of Cu 3 Sn is formed due to the decomposition of Cu 6 Sn 5 . [12,13,7] Andriy M. Gusak et al [10] concluded that one of the necessary condition for the porous structure formation is the overgrowth of IMC to deplete the free Sn. Therefore, retarding the overgrowth of IMC has become an increasingly important issue to inhibit the formation of porous Cu 3 Sn and ensure the stability of micro-interconnects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%