2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth differentiation factor-15 levels and the risk of contrast induced nephropathy in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A retrospective observation study

Abstract: AimsTo investigate the association between growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) and contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).MethodsA total of 311 patients with AMI were studied retrospectively. All patients were divided into two groups according to the occurrence of CIN after PCI. Baseline clinical data were compared between two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the NRI was calculated in the training cohort. Referring to reported studies [ 18 , 33 ], we used 10% and 30% as thresholds to define risk classes for low-risk (< 10%), intermediate risk (10%-30%), and high-risk (> 30%) patients, and compared with the LR1 model (< 10% for low risk, 10%-30% for intermediate risk, and 30% for highest risk), the LR2 model predicted an NRI of 8.92% for in-hospital all-cause mortality (Fig. 6 A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the NRI was calculated in the training cohort. Referring to reported studies [ 18 , 33 ], we used 10% and 30% as thresholds to define risk classes for low-risk (< 10%), intermediate risk (10%-30%), and high-risk (> 30%) patients, and compared with the LR1 model (< 10% for low risk, 10%-30% for intermediate risk, and 30% for highest risk), the LR2 model predicted an NRI of 8.92% for in-hospital all-cause mortality (Fig. 6 A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, net reclassification improvement (NRI) was calculated in the training cohort. Based on the previous studies [ 6 ], we used 10% and 30% as thresholds to define the risk grade of patients at low (<10%), intermediate (10 - 30%), and high risk (>30%), C-AMI model achieved an NRI of 23.5% as compared with the GRACE risk score (<10% as low risk, 10 - 30% as moderate risk, and 30% as highest risk) for predicting 30-day mortality ( Figure 5A ). In 49 patients with events within 30 days, 14 patients were correctly reclassified into a higher risk category by C-AMI model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, newer CI-AKI biomarkers, such as GDF-15 (12,13), cystatin C (22), and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) (23) were not included in the model because they are not generally detected at an early stage of the disease. Fourthly, serum creatinine was detected by the enzymatic method with creatininase coupled sarcosine oxidase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early identification of patients with AMI, who are likely to develop contrast induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) after an invasive treatment, will alert us to start an early therapy (e.g., iso-osmolar contrast media, fluids, pre-procedural statin) to preserve the renal function. Certain risk biomarkers (10,11) and predictive models (12,13) were reported to be capable of predicting the incidence of AKI. However, their predictive efficiency needs further improvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%