2011
DOI: 10.1080/00036840802534476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth effects of a comprehensive measure of globalization with country-specific time series data

Abstract: Many studies have estimated the growth effects of globalization where globalization was measured with a few economic variables, ignoring its social and political dimensions. Recently Dreher (2006) has developed a comprehensive measure of globalization with several variables from the economic, political and social sectors. He showed, with the panel data methods, that globalization has positive growth effect implying that countries with higher globalization grow faster. We argue that five year average growth rat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(35 reference statements)
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the regional growth in the European Union (EU-27) countries, globalisation affected it in a positive way according to Polasek and Sellner (2011). As the globalisation grows in Malaysia, Thailand, India and Philippines, the economic growth rates are higher too in these countries (Rao et al, 2011). For the case of Romanian economy, there are valuable the conclusions of Mutascu and Fleischer (2011) stating that on middle and log run, globalisation would maximize the economic growth.…”
Section: Globalisation and Economic Growth: A Short Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Regarding the regional growth in the European Union (EU-27) countries, globalisation affected it in a positive way according to Polasek and Sellner (2011). As the globalisation grows in Malaysia, Thailand, India and Philippines, the economic growth rates are higher too in these countries (Rao et al, 2011). For the case of Romanian economy, there are valuable the conclusions of Mutascu and Fleischer (2011) stating that on middle and log run, globalisation would maximize the economic growth.…”
Section: Globalisation and Economic Growth: A Short Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, the previous literature mainly focus on the macro side effects of globalization through concentrating on national economic factors (Dreher 2006, Rao et al 2011), entrepreneurship (Vining and De Kluijver 2007, life satisfaction (Hessami 2011) and human welfare (Tsai 2007), unionization (Dreher and Gaston 2007), political (Leibrecht et al 2011) and environmental issues (Lamla 2009), military interstate disputes (Choi 2010) etc., or nest the productivity and pass-through literatures spanning industrial organization, international trade, and international macro (De Loecker and Goldberg 2014) with a dearth on the ultimate financial outcomes of firm level effects. Among the highly limited past empirical research in the finance literature, Acheampong et al (2004) examined the profitability adjustment patterns of global firms and tested whether globalization equalizes speeds of profitability adjustment.…”
Section: Citation: Akdoğan E C (2018) How Globalization Affects Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is justified by Luintel et al (2008) who use the same approach as us by applying country by country time-series analyses. Also see Greiner et al (2005), King and Ramlogan (2008) and Rao et al (2011) for advantages of time-series methods. 2 Average years of schooling is the years of formal schooling received, on average, by adults over age 15.…”
Section: Country Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%