2006
DOI: 10.1097/01.hco.0000231409.69307.d2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth factor-induced therapeutic neovascularization for ischaemic vascular disease: time for a re-evaluation?

Abstract: Future trials must incorporate robust delivery strategies and address issues of study design including proper patient selection. Laboratory-based refinements in therapy, including a focus on the promotion of arteriogenesis and the modification of patient 'endotheliopathy', will all further enhance the potential of therapeutic neovascularization strategies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…21,22 The spinotrapezius muscles are a pair of skeletal muscles located on the dorsum adjacent to either side of the spine and running between the fourth thoracic and third lumbar vertebrae in mice. The mouse spinotrapezius is well perfused with highly developed collateral vessels and arcade arteriole loops in C57Bl/6 mice, and is only 60-200 mm thick, thus allowing en face observation of the muscle tissue and microvascular networks.…”
Section: Fty720-induced Microvascular Remodelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,22 The spinotrapezius muscles are a pair of skeletal muscles located on the dorsum adjacent to either side of the spine and running between the fourth thoracic and third lumbar vertebrae in mice. The mouse spinotrapezius is well perfused with highly developed collateral vessels and arcade arteriole loops in C57Bl/6 mice, and is only 60-200 mm thick, thus allowing en face observation of the muscle tissue and microvascular networks.…”
Section: Fty720-induced Microvascular Remodelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, clinical trials to date are negative or give conflicting results. [2][3][4] It is clear that collateral growth, angiogenesis, and vasculogenesis are parts of the same process in the succession of events leading to neovascularization, and it is likely that they may complement each other. Hence, to advance the therapeutic objective, strategies should focus on the promotion of neovascularization in general rather than targeting collateral growth or angiogenesis specifically.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Therapeutic angiogenesis is proposed as a complement or an alternative to surgical revascularization. To date, several proangiogenic factors, including VEGF and fibroblast growth factor, have been tested and have demonstrated convincing efficiency in acute and chronic experimental models 21 ; however, clinical trials to test VEGF or fibroblast growth factor angiogenic therapy in coronary and peripheral artery diseases were disappointing because their effects were inconsistent. 21,22 One of the explanations for the lack of efficiency of angiogenic therapy probably comes from the use of individual factors, whereas angiogenesis is known to involve a plethora of angiogenic factors.…”
Section: Err-␥: a Potential Target For Ischemic Tissue Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%