1993
DOI: 10.1016/0046-8177(93)90167-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth fraction in centrocytic and follicular center cell lymphomas: Assessment in paraffin sections with a proliferating cell nuclear antigen antibody and morphometric correlates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our semi-quantitative method of determining PI by estimating Ki-67-positive cells is a practical method applicable to daily practice. [18][19][20]25,30,31 In our FL cases with concurrent DLBCL, the PI in the DLBCL areas was even higher than in FL grade 3 (Table 1), suggesting biologic differences between FL grade 3 and transformed FL. This method avoids the pitfall of image analysis in which the larger cells (centroblasts), by occupying more area, give proportionally more signals than the smaller cells (centrocytes).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our semi-quantitative method of determining PI by estimating Ki-67-positive cells is a practical method applicable to daily practice. [18][19][20]25,30,31 In our FL cases with concurrent DLBCL, the PI in the DLBCL areas was even higher than in FL grade 3 (Table 1), suggesting biologic differences between FL grade 3 and transformed FL. This method avoids the pitfall of image analysis in which the larger cells (centroblasts), by occupying more area, give proportionally more signals than the smaller cells (centrocytes).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods include determination of mitotic index (6) and immunohistocheniical staining for proliferation associated markers, e.g. Ki-67 (7) or PCNA (8)(9)(10)(11). One advantage with the immunohistochemical approach is that antigen of interest can be selectively evaluated in tumour cell population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proliferative tumour fraction was assessed by manual count of mitoses and by immunostaining with an antibody directed against proliferative cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Follicular and diffuse areas of tumour growth were measured separately, with an average taken of the count of three fields at 1000× magnification and normalized to the number of CD20+ tumour cells 23. Mitotic figures (MFs) were counted in ten high‐power fields (HPFs) under 400× magnification.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%