2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1575850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth, History, or Institutions? What Explains State Fragility in Sub-Saharan Africa

Abstract: We explore the determinants of state fragility in sub-Saharan Africa. Controlling for a wide range of economic, demographic, geographic and istitutional regressors, we find that institutions, and in particular the civil liberties index and the number of revolutions, are the main determinants of fragility, even taking into account their potential endogeneity. Economic factors such as income growth and investment display a non robust impact after controlling for omitted variables and reverse causality. Colonial … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FCAS are countries or regions characterized by a high propensity for recurring conflict or war. FCAS often have unstable and corrupt governments who are unwilling to provide basic resources and protect the human rights of their citizens [ 2 – 4 ]. In 2020, the World Bank classified 37 countries as fragile and conflict-affected in their annual list of FCAS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FCAS are countries or regions characterized by a high propensity for recurring conflict or war. FCAS often have unstable and corrupt governments who are unwilling to provide basic resources and protect the human rights of their citizens [ 2 – 4 ]. In 2020, the World Bank classified 37 countries as fragile and conflict-affected in their annual list of FCAS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As per standard measurement concerns, the higher the CC, PSt, and V&Ac, the better the country's condition; however, for FSI and ExI, the higher the rating shows, the worst the country's condition. Fixed Effect methodology has been applied to examine the impact of governance and fragile state indicators on the quality of public institutions OLS (Ordinary Least Square) [ 19 , 58 , 59 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this study, an insight into selected Asia economies' governance practices and their effects on other countries can be examined in a simplified way [ 17 , 18 ]. In the past study, Bertocchi and Guerzoni [ 19 ] applied the Country Policy and Institutional Assessment and state fragility nexus in African countries, and Nguyen and Vo [ 20 ] discussed the corporate governance in banks in ASEAN; however, no study has explored the further analysis of CPIA in other regions yet, which makes this study interesting and fills the gap. This study tried to fill the gap of the last ten years by covering other regions to make a comprehensive study and focusing on the Sustainable Development Goals that emphasize strengthening the institutional development for state development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We capture the institutional dimensions of development by including measures for property rights obtained from the Heritage Foundation, measures of the rule of law obtained from the Worldwide Governance Indicators (2009) and measures of conflicts. In line with the tradition in the literature, notably, Bertocchi & Guerzoni (2012), we proxy conflict by the number of years a country witnessed armed conflicts (data obtained from the UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset) and the number of revolutions (data obtained from Banks (2001) dataset).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%