1985
DOI: 10.1210/jcem-61-2-223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth Hormone Responses to Continuous Infusions of Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone*

Abstract: The pattern of GH secretion during a continuous 4-h iv infusion of 1 microgram/kg.h GH-releasing hormone (1-44)-NH2 (GHRH-44) or saline was examined in 15 adult men. There was prompt release of GH beginning within 20 min of starting the GHRH-44 infusions, reaching peak GH levels of 43 +/- 11 (+/- SE) ng/ml within 60-90 min. This is similar to the peak GH level reached in men after a single 1 microgram/kg GHRH iv bolus dose (34 +/- 8 ng/ml). GH levels then fell progressively, but did not return to baseline duri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our results do not indicate the mechanism for this variability, they are consistent with the belief that fluctuations in hypothalamic SRIF secretion may variably modulate GH responses to GHRH stimulation (1 1). A similar phenomenon is observed in GH levels measured during the continuous infusion of GHRH: secretion of G H is increased overall, but continues to be pulsatile during the infusions, indicating ongoing variability in another modulator, which is most likely SRIF (9). Recently, Mazza and colleagues have noted that the GH response to GHRH is both increased and made less variable by co-administration of the drug pyridostigmine, which potentiates cholinergic tone, which in turn is believed to decrease SRIF secretion (13).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although our results do not indicate the mechanism for this variability, they are consistent with the belief that fluctuations in hypothalamic SRIF secretion may variably modulate GH responses to GHRH stimulation (1 1). A similar phenomenon is observed in GH levels measured during the continuous infusion of GHRH: secretion of G H is increased overall, but continues to be pulsatile during the infusions, indicating ongoing variability in another modulator, which is most likely SRIF (9). Recently, Mazza and colleagues have noted that the GH response to GHRH is both increased and made less variable by co-administration of the drug pyridostigmine, which potentiates cholinergic tone, which in turn is believed to decrease SRIF secretion (13).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The range of GH responses in normal subjects varies from very brisk to barely detectable, a far greater variability than that observed with administration of any other hypothalamic releasing factor. This high inter-individual variation in responses appears to be independent of the dose injected, and has also been reported after iv infusion of GHRH (9). Some of this variability may be attributable to differences in factors such as body weight (lo), but much occurs between individuals who do not appear to differ in any clinically important features (1, 7, 8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…This is partially in agreement with the fact that although GRF stimulates the release of HA in the HhS, the repeated administration of the neuropeptide does not alter the total amount of H-1 receptors (Table 3). Desensitization to GRF associated with down-regulation of GRF-binding sites ) cannot be ruled out, because chronic exposure of the pituitary to maximum concentrations of GRF causes partial loss of responsiveness in vivo (Gelato et al 1985 ;Wehrenberg et al 1986) and in vitro (Bilezikjian and Vale 1984). However, in our studies neither single nor repeated doses of GRF affected [3H] -mepyramine binding in different regions of the HhS where i.p.…”
Section: Effects Of Ip Grfi_44 On [3h] -Mepyramine Binding In the Hcontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…However, not only the administered dose but also variations in receptor sensitivity of the somatotrophs to GHRH probably have influenced the degree of pituitary stimulation. We have used a recommended standard dose of GHRH [27, 28, 29], but in other papers twice or even higher doses of GHRH were administered [4, 30]. Since we in the present study only used 1 µg/kg GHRH, the significant increase in peak GH response to GHRH stimulation compared to the response to ITT/arginine emphasized that many of the patients might have a hypothalamic rather than a pituitary damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%