2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2022.110352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth kinetics and passive behavior of the native oxide film on additively manufactured AlSi10Mg versus the conventional cast alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies on Al and Al-Si alloy showed that relatively high CPD variations with time (of more than 220 mV and 170 mV respectively for Al and Al-Si alloy) are obtained while measuring on freshly scratched surfaces. 79,80 These variations of the CPD values were due to the (re)-growth of the native oxide on the damaged section. Most CPD variations were observed within the first 20 min for pure Al and within the first 60 min for Al-Si alloy.…”
Section: Factors That Can Compromise the Validity Of Skpfm Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies on Al and Al-Si alloy showed that relatively high CPD variations with time (of more than 220 mV and 170 mV respectively for Al and Al-Si alloy) are obtained while measuring on freshly scratched surfaces. 79,80 These variations of the CPD values were due to the (re)-growth of the native oxide on the damaged section. Most CPD variations were observed within the first 20 min for pure Al and within the first 60 min for Al-Si alloy.…”
Section: Factors That Can Compromise the Validity Of Skpfm Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even after 2 h (for the case of pure Al) and 25 h (for the Al-Si alloy), considerable changes were detected in the measured CPD values. 79,80 Therefore, to avoid measuring on a non-stationary surface oxide, a waiting time is recommended after sample polishing/etching or after any other surface treatment that can remove or damage the surface oxide. This should allow the growth and stabilization of the surface oxides.…”
Section: Factors That Can Compromise the Validity Of Skpfm Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These large connected silicon precipitates, which are present near or at the melt pool boundary (as shown in Figure 3a-d), decelerated the corrosion, leading to a lower corrosion rate compared with that of the as-cast AlSi10Mg alloy. The microstructure has a great influence on the corrosion resistance of the SLMed AlSi10Mg alloy, and by tailoring the microstructure, it is possible to increase the corrosion resistance in this alloy [35]. The EIS data analysis showed a higher (R f + R c ) value for the SLMed AlSi10Mg alloys compared with the as-cast alloy (as shown in Table 2), which provide a less defective, more compact and more protective oxide layer on AM samples and indicates a lower corrosion rate.…”
Section: Post Corrosion Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%