1982
DOI: 10.1139/f82-084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth Model of Daphnia

Abstract: Data from experiments on feeding, assimilation, and reproduction of Daphnia pulex grown in different cell concentrations of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii formed the basis for an individual growth model for D. pulex. The model predictions of both the somatic growth and reproduction agree with subsequent experimental results. Contrary to many higher organisms, the assimilation efficiency increases with increasing body size. This may be, at least in part, the reason why larger body-sized zooplankton tend to dominate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
68
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An analysis similar to ours has been performed with another clone of D. pulex by Paloheimo et al (1982). As in our study, they found very good agreement between observed juvenile growth rates and those predicted from metabolic data, but contrary to our results and to those of Lampert (1977a, b), their observed investments in reproduction averaged -50% greater than predicted from physiological data.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An analysis similar to ours has been performed with another clone of D. pulex by Paloheimo et al (1982). As in our study, they found very good agreement between observed juvenile growth rates and those predicted from metabolic data, but contrary to our results and to those of Lampert (1977a, b), their observed investments in reproduction averaged -50% greater than predicted from physiological data.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…As in our study, they found very good agreement between observed juvenile growth rates and those predicted from metabolic data, but contrary to our results and to those of Lampert (1977a, b), their observed investments in reproduction averaged -50% greater than predicted from physiological data. Like us, Paloheimo et al (1982) failed to account for diel variation in the metabolic parameters, and they may have measured assimilation during a phase of low adult activity. In any event, their point estimates of assimilation are clearly too low, since they neglected 14C assimilated and subsequently respired before measurement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The ingestion rate is proportional the current, so to squared length. Allometric regressions of ingestion rates resulted in a proportionality with length to the power 2.2 [610], 1 [727], 2.4-3 [207], and 2.4 [686] in daphnids. This wide range of values illustrates the limited degree of replicatability of these types of measurements.…”
Section: Feeding Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Many investigators have proposed that a size threshold (e.g. Taylor 1985; Ketola and Vuorinen 1989;Lynch 1989) an age threshold (Sink0 and Streifer 1969; Paloheimo et al 1982), or a combination of an age and a size threshold triggers maturation (Tillmann and Lampert 1984). However, analyses of causes and consequences of such thresholds are lacking, although a threshold independent of the environment has been used to model Daphnia life history (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%