1973
DOI: 10.1149/1.2403302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth of GaP Layers from Thin Aliquot Melts: Liquid Phase Epitaxy as a Commercial Process

Abstract: The highest electroluminescent device performance in most III-V semiconductor materials was obtained on thin layers grown by liquid phase epitaxy (LPE). LPE has not been developed, however, as a commercial process. From a comparison of the factors affecting layer quality and process economy, it is concluded that a commercial LPE process Iavors the use of thin melts (possibly discarded after deposition), should provide substrate protection prior to deposition, and should be able to terminate LPE growth. ,%. sys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect, however, is overcome by pressure head effects for melt heights greater than -0.25 cm. It is important to point out that the dependence Of melt carry-over on melt height strongly suggests that confined melts (14) should significantly reduce melt carry-over, provided that a pressure head is not maintained on the confined melt by weights or other configurations such as a baffled solution holder. It is therefore desirable that boat configurations which minimize melt pressure head and, hence, carry-over be utilized in the LPE growth of InGaAsP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This effect, however, is overcome by pressure head effects for melt heights greater than -0.25 cm. It is important to point out that the dependence Of melt carry-over on melt height strongly suggests that confined melts (14) should significantly reduce melt carry-over, provided that a pressure head is not maintained on the confined melt by weights or other configurations such as a baffled solution holder. It is therefore desirable that boat configurations which minimize melt pressure head and, hence, carry-over be utilized in the LPE growth of InGaAsP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5]. It is important to point out that the dependence Of melt carry-over on melt height strongly suggests that confined melts (14) should significantly reduce melt carry-over, provided that a pressure head is not maintained on the confined melt by weights or other configurations such as a baffled solution holder. [10] of the theoretical model is applicable.…”
Section: ] Lwpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GaAs grown by LPE resulted in a thickness variation of 5% over 80% of the area of a 1 cm 2 sample . Additionally, a thickness variation between 3 and 10% has been demonstrated in a doped LPE layer across a substrate of 2.5 cm diameter for melt thicknesses up to 1 mm …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…11 Additionally, a thickness variation between 3 and 10% has been demonstrated in a doped LPE layer across a substrate of 2.5 cm diameter for melt thicknesses up to 1 mm. 12 Liquid-phase epitaxy (LPE) has been demonstrated with a boron-metal paste on interdigitated back-contact solar cells with a remarkable spatial accuracy and with region dimensions down to 120 μm. 13 This suggests the feasibility of LPE doping (LPED) for selective emitter formation, which has become an important aspect in the development of modern solar cell technologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%