2002
DOI: 10.1080/028275802753626782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth of Mixed Birch-Coniferous Stands in Relation to Pure Coniferous Stands at Similar Sites in South-eastern Norway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
32
2
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
7
32
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Spruce DBH growth was greater than that of birch. This supports the observations of Frivold and Frank (2002) Simardand and Vyse (2006) that the competitive effects of birch likely diminish as the stand ages. Further, Legare et al (2004) reported that black spruce DBH and height were greater when grown with aspen up to a threshold basal area of about 40% of the stand basal area.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Spruce DBH growth was greater than that of birch. This supports the observations of Frivold and Frank (2002) Simardand and Vyse (2006) that the competitive effects of birch likely diminish as the stand ages. Further, Legare et al (2004) reported that black spruce DBH and height were greater when grown with aspen up to a threshold basal area of about 40% of the stand basal area.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…3). Similar results have been obtained in other studies, both experimental and simulation-based, of birch and Norway spruce mixtures: Comparisons of mixtures and Norway spruce monocultures depend on stand age and stand rotation length since the species differs in growth rhythm (Fahlvik et al 2011), but a slight yield decrease could not be refuted (Frivold and Frank 2002;Agestam et al 2005). Accordingly, at the stem densities in our study, the proportion of Norway spruce was not linearly correlated with total stem volume production.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…When managing Norway spruce-birch mixtures, the challenge is to identify and apply appropriate treatments at appropriate times, i.e., when the species complement each other rather than compete with each other. Mixtures have often been evaluated in terms of either species-specific or total yields (Tham 1994;Valkonen and Valsta 2001;Frivold and Frank 2002;Johansson 2003;Fahlvik et al 2005;Vila et al 2007;Piotto 2008;Gamfeldt et al 2013), or from a unilateral perspective, using birch to facilitate Norway spruce cultivation (Bergqvist 1999;Langvall and Löfvenius 2002), as when one species is used as a nurse tree for other species (Ambrozy 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the meantime, analyses of forest inventory data have produced conflicting support for diversity-function relationships in forests, showing either a positive relationship between diversity and productivity (Caspersen and Pacala, 2001), no relationship (Enquist and Niklas, 2001), or a positive or negative relationship depending on the identity of the dominant species in a mixed-species stand (Frivold and Frank, 2002).…”
Section: Storage and Biodiversitymentioning
confidence: 99%