Growth of Pacific oysters, Crassostrea gigas Thunberg, cultivated in Tasmania. I. Intertidal stick culture

Abstract

Growth of Pacific oyster spat caught commercially in intertidal zones of the River Tamar was monitored for 6 months. After 90 days Tamar spat had a mean length of 14.3 mm. Reduced growth rates with falling water temperatures were noted. Oysters transferred to the Pipeclay Lagoon lease grew to 75 mm length and 52 mm width in only 12 months. Average live weight was 42.8 g and drained flesh weight 6.3 g. Seasonal differences in growth were apparent with major shell increases in autumn months. Shell width increased preferentially over length in winter but thereafter was always less. In contrast to other reported studies, summer growth rates were markedly reduced. Exposure to high air temperatures coupled with reproductive activity may be responsible. Growth of oysters during the second year on the growing lease was reduced but followed similar patterns to the previous year. At termination of study, 28-month-old oysters averaged 89.9 mm length and 61.7 mm width, had a live weight of 69.1 g and a drained flesh weight of 13.3 g.

Culture possibilities of the razor clam Ensis arcuatus (Pharidae: Bivalvia)

“…Juvenile growth can be highly affected by the site selected, especially referring to intertidal or subtidal location for on‐growing. Growth is proportional to immersion time (Sumner 1980, 1981; Goulletquer, Lombas & Prou 1987). Higher growth can be exhibited in subtidal locations due to a more constant food supply; thus, E. arcuatus on‐growing time could be reduced in future experiments.…”

The immunobiology of Crepidula fornicata and its potential to act as a harbourer of infectious disease

“…The major morphometric difference that was noted in the intertidal and subtidal individuals was that intertidal C. fornicata had heavier gills, these larger gills were thought to be a physiological adaptation to reduced feeding times. In other molluscs, a size discrepancy between intertidal and subtidal individuals have been noted, with subtidal animals generally being larger (Sumner, 1981;Gam et al, 2008;Tagliarolo et al, 2012). Differences in stack sizes may reflect the different sediment types at Swansea Bay and Milford Haven.…”