2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.85.083502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth of structure in the Szekeres class-II inhomogeneous cosmological models and the matter-dominated era

Abstract: This study belongs to a series devoted to using the Szekeres inhomogeneous models in order to develop a theoretical framework where cosmological observations can be investigated with a wider range of possible interpretations. While our previous work addressed the question of cosmological distances versus redshift in these models, the current study is a start at looking into the growth rate of large-scale structure. The Szekeres models are exact solutions to Einstein's equations that were originally derived wit… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
48
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
3
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The code simsilun is publicly available via the Bitbucket repository * and is distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License. The code can easily be modified to include further effects, such as light propagation (Räsänen, 2010;Bolejko, 2011;Clarkson et al, 2012;Bolejko & Ferreira, 2012;Troxel et al, 2014;Peel et al, 2014), modelling of inhomogeneous non-symmetrical cosmic structures (Bolejko, 2006(Bolejko, , 2007Ishak & Peel, 2012;Peel et al, 2012;Sussman & Delgado Gaspar, 2015;Sussman et al, 2016), and the impact of the local cosmological environment on astronomical observations (Bolejko et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The code simsilun is publicly available via the Bitbucket repository * and is distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License. The code can easily be modified to include further effects, such as light propagation (Räsänen, 2010;Bolejko, 2011;Clarkson et al, 2012;Bolejko & Ferreira, 2012;Troxel et al, 2014;Peel et al, 2014), modelling of inhomogeneous non-symmetrical cosmic structures (Bolejko, 2006(Bolejko, , 2007Ishak & Peel, 2012;Peel et al, 2012;Sussman & Delgado Gaspar, 2015;Sussman et al, 2016), and the impact of the local cosmological environment on astronomical observations (Bolejko et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is unfortunate since real structures are not exactly spherically symmetric, making it important to know if spherical symmetry is essential for the agreement between Swiss cheese and perturbative results 2 . It is in this respect notable that anisotropic Szekeres models exhibit structure formation that deviates significantly from both that of the underlying LTB models and from predictions of perturbation theory [34][35][36][37][38]. In addition, it is very clear from figure 7a in [28] that light propagation is significantly affected by anisotropy; in that figure, it is seen that an initially radial light ray following an exact geodesic of an anisotropic Szekeres model moves through a significantly different density field than a light ray traced simply by using the Born approximation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…To our knowledge this paper contains the first ever study which seeks to use exact solutions of Einstein's equations to model structures giving rise to nonlinear expansion on scales comparable to those observed, constrained directly by both ray-tracing of the CMB and by the Hubble expansion field from actual surveys. While the Szekeres solution has been employed for a number of cosmological problems [56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65], we believe that this is also the first time that it has been used for ray-tracing simulations of local structures. We will see that although we are not able to match all features of the nonlinear Hubble expansion below the statistical homogeneity scale, with the Szekeres solution we can nonetheless match more features of the actual data than with other models, including the standard FLRW cosmology with a local boost of the Local Group of galaxies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%