2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2005.08.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth of zinc phthalocyanine onto ZnS film investigated by synchrotron radiation-excited X-ray photoelectron and near-edge absorption spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
40
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ratio between the pyrrole and benzene carbon contributions in PES depends on the surface sensitivity and molecular orientation. 22 For N1s, only one dominant peak appears at 398.8 eV, accompanied by a weak shake-up structure at 1.8 eV higher binding energy, which is close to the HOMO/LUMO gap. 23 Spectra from films in the monolayer region display completely different line profiles.…”
Section: Photoelectron Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ratio between the pyrrole and benzene carbon contributions in PES depends on the surface sensitivity and molecular orientation. 22 For N1s, only one dominant peak appears at 398.8 eV, accompanied by a weak shake-up structure at 1.8 eV higher binding energy, which is close to the HOMO/LUMO gap. 23 Spectra from films in the monolayer region display completely different line profiles.…”
Section: Photoelectron Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…At 3.8 ML, the line profiles in the π * region from the two polarizations resemble each other and are also consistent with previously reported results for ZnPc. 22,49,50 One can estimate the molecular tilt angle to 33…”
Section: Nexafsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[41][42][43][44] However, it has recently been reported that improved curve fitting can be made by splitting the benzene carbon peak into two weighted components ͑along with their corresponding shake-up satellites͒ ϳ0.4 eV apart from each other. 45 This separation could be either due to the electronegative difference between the local environments of the C 2 and C 3,4 carbon atoms of the CuPc ͑i.e., three compared to two C nearest neighbors͒ giving an additional chemical shift, 46,47 due to the excitation of an in-plane C-H stretching vibrational mode following the excitation of the photoelectron from the C 1s level for the nonfluorinated Pc, 25 or due to differences in screening on each of the C atoms. In the fluorinated case the in-plane C-F stretching mode is reduced to ϳ0.18 eV from 0.38 eV for C-H in CuPc and an additional peak due to this vibrational loss is no longer vital to achieve a good fit to the C 1s photoemission spectrum.…”
Section: X-ray Photoemissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23] The derived binding energies of the peak components are listed in Table 1. We note that possible satellite features in the spectra as observed, for example, for phthalocyanines [24] are not taken into consideration, since the optical gap for DNA bases is large (approximately 4.44-4.64 eV for cytosine and thymine). [14] Therefore, such features are expected to occur well separated at higher BEs.…”
Section: X-ray Photoemission Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%