Growth performance, digestibility, and blood biochemical parameters of Nile tilapia (
            <i>Oreochromis niloticus</i>
            ) reared in floating cages and fed poultry by-product meal

Palupi, Esti Tuhu; Setiawati, Mia; Lumlertdacha, Sonkphan; Suprayudi, Muhammad Agus

doi:10.1080/10454438.2019.1605324

Cited by 11 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…These qualities make poultry by‐product meal as one of the most promising alternative feed ingredients for fish meal in aqua diets. Fish meal has been successfully replaced by poultry by‐product meal in diets of Nile tilapia (Aydin & Gumuş, 2012; Guimarães et al, 2012; Palupi et al, 2020; Yones & Metwalli, 2015) and other fish diets such as spotted rose snapper (Hernández et al, 2014), black sea bream (Irm et al, 2020), giant croaker (Wu et al, 2018) and sea bass (Siddik et al, 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of dietary protein substitution of fish meal with bioprocessed poultry by‐product meal on growth performances, nutrient utilization, whole‐body composition and haemato‐biochemical responses of GIFT tilapia reared in floating cages

Sathishkumar

Felix

Prabu

2021

Aquaculture Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A 60‐day feeding trial was conducted to examine the effects of replacing fish meal protein with poultry by‐product meal (PBM) and bioprocessed poultry by‐product meal (BPBM) on growth performance, nutrient utilization, whole‐body chemical and amino acid composition and haemato‐biochemical responses in GIFT tilapia reared in floating cages. Seven isonitrogenous (320 g/kg crude protein), isolipidic (50 g/kg crude lipid) and isoenergetic (17 MJ/kg) experimental diets were formulated by replacing 0%, 33.33%, 66.67% and 100% of fish meal protein with PBM and BPBM respectively and referred as Control, PBM 33.33, PBM 66.67, PBM 100, BPBM 33.33, BPBM 66.67 and BPBM 100. Triplicate groups of 30 GIFT tilapia juveniles with an average initial weight of 11.28 ± 0.14 g were fed with experimental diets daily thrice until apparent satiation (08:00, 12:00 and 16:00 h). Among PBM and BPBM dietary groups, significantly (p < 0.05) higher growth performance and nutrient utilization were observed in fish fed BPBM 66.67 group compared to other treatment diets including control diet. No significant difference (p > 0.05) was observed in survival rate of GIFT tilapia fed different levels of PBM and BPBM‐incorporated diets. Moreover, dietary inclusion of PBM and BPBM did not (p > 0.05) affect the whole‐body chemical and amino acid composition and haemato‐biochemical responses in GIFT tilapia. It is concluded that PBM and BPBM can completely replace dietary fish meal protein in GIFT tilapia diets without any negative impact on growth performances, nutrient utilization and blood haemato‐biochemical responses. However, significantly higher growth performances and nutrient utilization were obtained in fish fed BPBM 66.67 diet.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of dietary protein substitution of fish meal with bioprocessed poultry by‐product meal on growth performances, nutrient utilization, whole‐body composition and haemato‐biochemical responses of GIFT tilapia reared in floating cages

Sathishkumar

Felix

Prabu

2021

Aquaculture Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Los resultados de la presente investigación indicaron que la humedad del cuerpo de la tilapia aumentó (T15 y T20) significativamente (p<0.05), según se incrementó el palmiste en la dieta. Al mismo tiempo, el valor de PC disminuyó, cuando los niveles de palmiste en las dietas fueron de 15 y 20%, como se informó anteriormente en otras investigaciones (21,30). Sobre este tema, Adjanke et al (31) demostraron que la inclusión de palmiste hasta un 10% en la dieta, no afectó la humedad y la proteína cruda del cuerpo de la tilapia (O. niloticus).…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Efecto del palmiste en la nutrición de alevines de tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)

León

Martínez²,

Viana³

et al. 2022

Rev MVZ Córdoba

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objetivo. Determinar la respuesta de los indicadores productivos al incluir palmiste (Elaeis guineensis) en dietas para la nutrición de alevines de tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Material y métodos. Se utilizaron 300 machos masculinizados de tilapia (4,89 ± 0,09 g) y se distribuyeron bajo un diseño completamente al azar con tres repeticiones por tratamiento (20 peces por repetición). Se utilizó palmiste para formular cinco dietas isoproteicas (30,64%), isolipídicas (7,38%) e isoenergéticas (11,84 MJ kg-1 de alimento), control (T0), 5% (T5); 10% (T10); 15% (T15) y 20% (T20) para alimentar durante 60 días. Resultados. Los peces alimentados con los tratamientos T0, T5 y T10, no mostraron diferencias significativas (p> 0.05), pero sí con T15 y T20 en la digestibilidad de los nutrientes, el crecimiento y la composición del cuerpo. La inclusión de palmiste hasta el 20% de la dieta, disminuyó el costo del alimento. Se observó un alto grado de dependencia entre el contenido de fibra detergente neutro (%), la digestibilidad aparente de la materia seca (%) y la digestibilidad aparente de la proteína (%) (R2 = 0,732 y R2 = 0,774; p <0,000), respectivamente. Conclusiones. El palmiste se puede usar hasta el 10% en dietas para alevines de tilapia, sin afectar la digestibilidad aparente de los nutrientes, el crecimiento y el contenido nutricional en todo el cuerpo. La inclusión progresiva de palmiste en las dietas, disminuyó el costo del alimento, para un cultivo de tilapia más rentable.

show abstract

“…According to Dong et al (2010), most of the times ingredients had at least one limiting characteristic in relation to its use, such as antinutritional factors of plant ingredients, which reduce the bioavailability of nutrients for the organism (Francis et al 2001). Fishmeal is the main input of animal origin in diets, but it has an inconsistent availability, great variability in terms of composition, it is considered an ecological liability and its cost can preclude aquaculture production as a whole (Palupi et al 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Animal byproducts such as meat and bone, feather and viscera meals are widely used as protein ingredients (Boscolo et al 2004), and in Brazil, those represent important raw materials for the productive sector, especially in relation to the characteristics previously mentioned, seen that the country is the third largest poultry producer and the fourth pig producer in the world (ABPA 2020). However, the nutritional quality of these byproducts might be a limiting factor due to its variable composition, high ash content, low nutritional availability and imbalance of amino acids (Boscolo et al 2008;Hernández et al 2010;Palupi et al 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…the case of plant materials, high concentrations of anti-nutritional factors may be present(Francis et al 2001;Sarker et al 2016;Palupi et al 2020). These aspects reduce the bioavailability of nutrients, thus in addition to digestibility, it is necessary to verify the digestible values of ingredients, which indicate the adequate amount of the nutrients and energy from the raw materials that are available for the absorption and metabolism…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Digestibility of Swine Liver and Swine Meat Protein Hydrolysates by Nile Tilapia

Cardoso

Nettson

Freitas

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to evaluate the digestibility of protein, amino acids and energy of hydrolysates made of swine liver and swine meat by the Nile tilapia. The fish were distributed in 12 tanks with conical bottoms, in a completely randomized design with three treatments and four replicates, characterized by a control treatment and two diets containing the test ingredients: swine liver hydrolysate and swine meat hydrolysate. The coefficient of apparent digestibility was higher for both hydrolysates in comparison to the control, with percentages above 83% for dry matter 95% for crude protein and 92% for energy. Regarding amino acids, the coefficients remained at 98-100% for both hydrolysates. The digestibility percentages of both hydrolysates were higher than commonly used ingredients in the formulation of diets for Nile tilapia, of both plant and animal-origin. The hydrolysates tested in this study presented an excellent use in relation of essential amino acids by the Nile tilapia. Based on the results of digestibility, digestible energy and protein in this study, swine liver and meat hydrolysates have the potential to be used in the formulation of diets for this commercially important fish species.

show abstract

Growth performance, digestibility, and blood biochemical parameters of Nile tilapia ( Oreochromis niloticus ) reared in floating cages and fed poultry by-product meal

Cited by 11 publications

References 42 publications

Effects of dietary protein substitution of fish meal with bioprocessed poultry by‐product meal on growth performances, nutrient utilization, whole‐body composition and haemato‐biochemical responses of GIFT tilapia reared in floating cages

Effects of dietary protein substitution of fish meal with bioprocessed poultry by‐product meal on growth performances, nutrient utilization, whole‐body composition and haemato‐biochemical responses of GIFT tilapia reared in floating cages

Efecto del palmiste en la nutrición de alevines de tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)

Digestibility of Swine Liver and Swine Meat Protein Hydrolysates by Nile Tilapia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About