2017
DOI: 10.4314/bajopas.v10i1.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth performance of juveniles <i>Oreochromis niloticus</i> reared with two different diets in Kunduchi Ponds, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania

Abstract: Comparative study was conducted to observe the growth performance, length and condition factor of Oreochromis niloticus fed with two different diets using standard methods and procedures. The fish were fed with two different formulated Kunduchi Locally processed Feed (KLF) for a period of six weeks. Maximum weight gain of (10.74 to 12.48 g) was recorded with Kunduchi locally feed (KLF) with specific growth rate of (5.56 to 6.37 % per day), while minimum w Feed (AAF) with specific growth rate of (5.14 to 5.73 %… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variations in LWR for the same fish species in different studies have often been observed depending on season, population and environmental conditions (Froese, 2006). Wild Nile tilapia from Lake Naivasha, Kenya, and Kunduchi Ponds, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania, also showed negative allometric growth as observed in the present study (Bwathondi & Abdulkarim, 2017; Otieno et al., 2014). Regression equations of LWR, in all treatment groups, showed higher values of the correlation of coefficient ( R 2 = 0.99), indicating a close relationship between length and weight (Alhassan et al., 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Variations in LWR for the same fish species in different studies have often been observed depending on season, population and environmental conditions (Froese, 2006). Wild Nile tilapia from Lake Naivasha, Kenya, and Kunduchi Ponds, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania, also showed negative allometric growth as observed in the present study (Bwathondi & Abdulkarim, 2017; Otieno et al., 2014). Regression equations of LWR, in all treatment groups, showed higher values of the correlation of coefficient ( R 2 = 0.99), indicating a close relationship between length and weight (Alhassan et al., 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The length-weight relationship is widely accepted as an important tool in aquaculture in terms of growth performance, feed utilization, population dynamics, and stock management (Abdoli et al, 2008). Bwathondi & Abdulkarim (2017) found that the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) values in the CON and PBG groups with two different diets were 0.71 and 0.95, respectively of Oreochromis niloticus, while the PBG group significantly indicates good fitness. Datta et al (2013) observed that the length-weight logarithmic relationship between length and weight with regression equation coefficient 'b' varied between 2.7675 to 4.3922 with different supplemental diets during the experi-mental period.…”
Section: Length-weight Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%