2021
DOI: 10.1080/87559129.2021.1961268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth Promoters in Cattle and Pigs: A Review of Legislation and Implications for Human Health

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, international and national regulatory agencies, such as Food and Agriculture Organization/ WHO, Food and Drug Administration, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority, European Commission, European Food Safety Authority, and the Ministry of Health of each country, continuously attempt to regulate antibiotic use with international standards, considering the specific realities of each country. This harmonization mainly involves the control of parameters, such as (1) acceptable daily intake (ADI), which is a critical standard set from toxicological studies based on the no-observable-effect level and safety factor [68]; (2) withdrawal period or waiting time (WT), which refers to the minimum period from the administration of the last dose of medication and the production of meat or other animal-derived products for food (Figure -2) [68,69]; and (3) MRL, which is the highest level of an antibiotic residue or its metabolites that is legally tolerated in food when antibiotics are correctly applied following Good Agricultural Practice [20]. Although the ADI, WT, and MRL for most antibiotics have been established (for each food) and efforts have been made to regulate the MRL worldwide under the aegis of the World Trade Organization and the Codex Alimentarius, MRLs still vary from one geographical location to another.…”
Section: National and International Legislation On Antibiotic Residue...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, international and national regulatory agencies, such as Food and Agriculture Organization/ WHO, Food and Drug Administration, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority, European Commission, European Food Safety Authority, and the Ministry of Health of each country, continuously attempt to regulate antibiotic use with international standards, considering the specific realities of each country. This harmonization mainly involves the control of parameters, such as (1) acceptable daily intake (ADI), which is a critical standard set from toxicological studies based on the no-observable-effect level and safety factor [68]; (2) withdrawal period or waiting time (WT), which refers to the minimum period from the administration of the last dose of medication and the production of meat or other animal-derived products for food (Figure -2) [68,69]; and (3) MRL, which is the highest level of an antibiotic residue or its metabolites that is legally tolerated in food when antibiotics are correctly applied following Good Agricultural Practice [20]. Although the ADI, WT, and MRL for most antibiotics have been established (for each food) and efforts have been made to regulate the MRL worldwide under the aegis of the World Trade Organization and the Codex Alimentarius, MRLs still vary from one geographical location to another.…”
Section: National and International Legislation On Antibiotic Residue...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of hormonal products is overseen by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicine Authority (APVMA), which states that the use of hormonal growth promoters is safe when applied according to the label instructions. Australia also has a hormone-free food-producing animals program that produces meat for the European market [ 50 , 51 ].…”
Section: Legislative Measures For the Use Of Aasmentioning
confidence: 99%