2006
DOI: 10.1134/s0016702906120081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth rate of the {0001} and {0111} faces of quartz as a function of temperature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the most part, the range of activation energies found here further exceeds previously reported values for the activation energy of dissolution, 89 ± 5 kJ mol −1 (Tester et al, 1994), 71 ± 9 kJ mol −1 (Dove and Crerar, 1990), and 67 to 77 kJ mol −1 (Rimstidt and Barnes, 1980), and precipitation/growth, 84 ± (4-8) kJ mol −1 (Laudise, 1959;Ostapenko and Mitsyuk, 2006). These rather low values likely document that dissolution of real crystals is dominated by processes at crystal defects (see discussion by Adeagbo et al, 2008;Dove and Crerar, 1990).…”
Section: Diffusion Pathsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…For the most part, the range of activation energies found here further exceeds previously reported values for the activation energy of dissolution, 89 ± 5 kJ mol −1 (Tester et al, 1994), 71 ± 9 kJ mol −1 (Dove and Crerar, 1990), and 67 to 77 kJ mol −1 (Rimstidt and Barnes, 1980), and precipitation/growth, 84 ± (4-8) kJ mol −1 (Laudise, 1959;Ostapenko and Mitsyuk, 2006). These rather low values likely document that dissolution of real crystals is dominated by processes at crystal defects (see discussion by Adeagbo et al, 2008;Dove and Crerar, 1990).…”
Section: Diffusion Pathsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…A single observation at 0.6 GPa indicates a subordinate effect of pressure. For the most part, the range of activation energies found here further exceeds previously reported values for the activation energy of dissolution, 89 ± 5 kJ mol −1 (Tester et al, 1994), 71 ± 9 kJ mol −1 (Dove and Crerar, 1990), and 67 to 77 kJ mol −1 (Rimstidt and Barnes, 1980), and precipitation/growth, 84 ± (4-8) kJ mol −1 (Laudise, 1959;Ostapenko and Mitsyuk, 2006). These rather low values likely document that dissolution of real crystals is dominated by processes at crystal defects (see discussion by Adeagbo et al, 2008;Dove and Crerar, 1990).…”
Section: Results and Their Comparison To Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 41%
“…This switch from preferential dissolution during the equilibration to growth at equilibrium concentration may be related to a contrasting order of dissolution kinetics and surface energy for the low index orientations. Several previous studies found that c faces grow faster than any other face at conditions not too far away from the ones of our experiments (Laudise, 1959;Okamoto and Sekine, 2011;Ostapenko and Mitsyuk, 2006). Surfaces that experienced substantial dissolution may also simply have developed a defect structure that is particularly suitable for subsequent precipitation (compare Bickmore et al, 2008;Schlegel et al, 2002).…”
Section: Process Sequence In Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 81%