1998
DOI: 10.1006/jare.1998.0443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth rates, salt tolerance and water use characteristics of native and invasive riparian plants from the delta of the Colorado River, Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
93
1
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
93
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the extreme aridity of the study area and the high salinity of the agricultural return flows that maintain limitrophe reach vegetation during nonflood years, drought stress due to groundwater decline and salinity likely govern diversity levels. These stressors give competitive advantage to drought tolerant T. ramosissima (Busch and Smith 1995;Glenn et al 1998). This species was shown to outcompete P. sericia, B. salicifolia, P. fremontii, and S. gooddingii under conditions of elevated salinity and drought stress (Stromberg 1998;Vandersande et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the extreme aridity of the study area and the high salinity of the agricultural return flows that maintain limitrophe reach vegetation during nonflood years, drought stress due to groundwater decline and salinity likely govern diversity levels. These stressors give competitive advantage to drought tolerant T. ramosissima (Busch and Smith 1995;Glenn et al 1998). This species was shown to outcompete P. sericia, B. salicifolia, P. fremontii, and S. gooddingii under conditions of elevated salinity and drought stress (Stromberg 1998;Vandersande et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3-D eddy covariance data from T. ramosissima and P. deltoides communities, measured across a full growing season at multiple sites, will greatly assist in the success or failure of planning regional water resources, characterizing and explaining plant invasions, and restoring riparian gallery forests. Glenn et al, 1998 31 days g (g shoot fresh weight) -1 day -1 Xu et al, 1998 full season (183 days) mm yr -1 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mid-summer Landsat image was selected in each study year and used for computing NDVI o , NDVI s , and NDVI*, which was integrated with annual grass-based reference ET (ET o ) [51] and precipitation to map annual riparian ET based on Equation (1). The average annual ET was estimated for the subareas in CA (1,5,6) and the subareas in AZ (2,3,4), and was compared with two independent ET estimates: the remotely sensed MODIS ET product known as MOD16 [52,53] averaged over the same subareas, and the crop-coefficient approach implemented by USBR in the Lower Colorado River Accounting System (LCRAS) and reported for the CA and AZ sections of the study area.…”
Section: Long-term Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glenn and Nagler [3] reported that tamarisk spreads at rates exceeding 20 km·year −1 , becoming a dominant plant on the banks of rivers, streams, and ponds from eastern Oklahoma to northwestern California, and from western Montana to Sonora, Mexico. In addition, tamarisk has a high tolerance to salinity [4,5] and drought [6]. The negative impacts of tamarisk invasion include, but are not limited to: displacing native vegetation [3,7], increasing fire frequency [8], degrading wildlife habitat [9], reducing biodiversity [10], and increasing water consumption [2,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%