2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.dendro.2017.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth responses to climate in a tree-ring network of European beech ( Fagus sylvatica L.) from the eastern limit of its natural distribution area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
15
1
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
7
15
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As hypothesized, growth responded to drought across the whole distribution range, except for the dry distribution margin. Our observation of decreasing drought sensitivity towards the southern distribution margin in Spain contrasts the often reported growth limitations of beech by drought at the equatorial edge, especially at lower altitudes (Di Filippo et al, 2007;Jump, Hunt, & Peñuelas, 2006;Piovesan et al, 2008;Roibu, Popa, Kirchhefer, & Palaghianu, 2017).…”
Section: Decreasing Drought Sensitivity Towards the Dry Distributiocontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…As hypothesized, growth responded to drought across the whole distribution range, except for the dry distribution margin. Our observation of decreasing drought sensitivity towards the southern distribution margin in Spain contrasts the often reported growth limitations of beech by drought at the equatorial edge, especially at lower altitudes (Di Filippo et al, 2007;Jump, Hunt, & Peñuelas, 2006;Piovesan et al, 2008;Roibu, Popa, Kirchhefer, & Palaghianu, 2017).…”
Section: Decreasing Drought Sensitivity Towards the Dry Distributiocontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…Sensitivity of beech growth to winter cold is presently seldom reported in dendroecological research. Some multisite studies also include montane to subalpine beech populations and locally detected growth sensitivity to winter cold for Central European high altitude sites and the Pyrenees (Dittmar et al., ), the Eastern Alps (Di Filippo et al., ), the Carpathians (Kern & Popa, ; Roibu et al., ) and the southern Balkans (Fyllas et al., ). However, the authors often do not further explore their findings of locally important winter cold sensitivity, but rather focus on the drought sensitivity of beech, which is more important at the regional level (Dittmar et al., ; Fyllas et al., ; Roibu et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some multisite studies also include montane to subalpine beech populations and locally detected growth sensitivity to winter cold for Central European high altitude sites and the Pyrenees (Dittmar et al., ), the Eastern Alps (Di Filippo et al., ), the Carpathians (Kern & Popa, ; Roibu et al., ) and the southern Balkans (Fyllas et al., ). However, the authors often do not further explore their findings of locally important winter cold sensitivity, but rather focus on the drought sensitivity of beech, which is more important at the regional level (Dittmar et al., ; Fyllas et al., ; Roibu et al., ). Moreover, a local winter cold signal could possibly have altogether gone unreported, e.g., for the high‐altitude Apennines, due to the prevalence of the regional drought signal in the multivariate analysis and the strong differences in precipitation amount between sites (Piovesan, Biondi, Bernabei, Di Filippo, & Schirone, ) or due to the hypothesis‐driven focus on drought as the major driver of beech growth from the start (Piovesan, Biondi, Di Filippo, Alessandrini, & Maugeri, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations