Labour, Employment and Economic Growth in India 2015
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781316156476.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth, Structural Change and Poverty Reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hasan, Lamba and Gupta (2013) have examined the issue of growth, structural change and poverty reduction. As a part of their larger study, using the decomposition methodology devised by McMillan and Rodrik, they analyse whether structural change is growth enhancing or growth reducing over the period 1987–2009.…”
Section: Review Of Literature On Structural Changes and Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hasan, Lamba and Gupta (2013) have examined the issue of growth, structural change and poverty reduction. As a part of their larger study, using the decomposition methodology devised by McMillan and Rodrik, they analyse whether structural change is growth enhancing or growth reducing over the period 1987–2009.…”
Section: Review Of Literature On Structural Changes and Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the studies, for example McMillan et al (2014), De-Vries et al (2015), Padilla-Pérez and Villarreal (2017), Ahson et al (2017) found within effect stronger than structural change effect in bringing changes in aggregate productivity. However, Hasan et al (2013) and Nguyen (2018) observed varying contributions from the two components in the aggregate productivity growth.…”
Section: Empirical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, this rate of poverty reduction had not sustained during the post reforms period, 1991-2008. This is mainly due to lower attainment levels of human development indicators such as nutrition, health, and education (Hasan et al, 2013). During this period, the growth was largely in the services sector where the beneficiaries were mainly non-poor with a relatively higher level of attainment in human development indicators as compared to the rural poor who were mainly dependent on agriculture.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%